COMMENT [648]

When it comes to matters of keeping the traditional view of the family-structure and man-and-woman relationships held up as the essential role that it is, there are some fools who would say that for those who have a desire for same-sex partnerships, there would be ways to start freezing eggs and artificial insemination and things like that, but again, that’s a dum’ idea aswell, because you are not supposed to have children just for the sake of taking part in some shitty social experiment, or for a reason which, based on its own principles, is also backwards as shit. So the relationship between a man and woman, and man getting married to a woman and raising kids as both a mother and father parent union, both go hand-in-hand. Again it’s nature, it’s not just irrelevant bullshit someone read in a book and is just regurgitating it because of some pissy mainstream “platform” and they have to keep an audience; this is nature, it took a man and a woman to make a child, and it will take a man and a woman to properly raise a fucking child aswell.

The thing where they “freeze” eggs and so-on, makes more sense for men and woman who cannot have children because of medical problems, only then in that case, does it makes sense. This trend where, you are going to release a kid or children into the care of a homosexual lifestyle for “up-bringing”, is a bullshit “social experiment”; this is not the purpose for kids — this is some twisted nutty retardation that’s being promoted. People need to be treated with respect and homosexuals are no different, but it doesn’t mean that the homosexual lifestyle is free from any consequential effects. There needs to be “balance”; man and woman made child, man and woman raise child, man and woman provide a chemistry of love for the care of child that nurtures the fragile soul of the newborn.

This mass-distribution of “frozen eggs” and “frozen sperm” is an abuse and a manipulation of procreation — a highly “processed” procedure and approach to procreation, that strips away the special nurture, affection, and preciousness of what it means to bring a new being into life.

This isn’t getting into no body’s “bedroom”; “homosexuality” is one of the oldest words in the fucking dictionary. I am dealing with “terms” and actual “meanings” of things, not philosophies and pedantic emotions. This is not some shitty “shock” stunt — homosexuality is a lifestyle that doesn’t make any sense definition-wise, and in the context of procreation, and in most matters relevant to “family structure”, “fertility”, “less confusion” and “social instability” etc.

I don’t need to know anyone personally, or know what anyone is doing behind closed doors, to know that the meaning of a fucking word in the dictionary does not sound as if it is defining something that sounds wise. The meaning of “homosexuality” by definition in the dictionary doesn’t sound as if it is describing a habit or deviance that should be “prioritized” — it’s not a shock that people will not have their intelligence insulted by acts of any kind that are backwards and silly.

Life and its multiplicity is a 3-step righteous revolve: reproduce, raise, replenish. The “homosexual” stuff is just: duplicative, disastrous, dapple-ganger-ish deviance leading to depopulating drop-off and decline.

Notions to the contrary that are suggesting the union of man and woman isn’t the natural way, the original way and the proper way, is misguided — pure misinformation, which misinforms and misleads and  misinterprets the true reality of this situation.