Optimal Deconstruction

If I don’t get fat from “sugar” but someone else does but someone else doesn’t and someone else does, even though the sugar itself remains the same thing that has not changed from one person to the next, this essentially is a significant sign that shows that it is how a person’s body reacts to the sugar that is making the difference. But if you listen to these clueless sources who are said to be “experts”, they want you to believe that “sugar” and “processed foods” are “inherently” bad; but these things are not inherently bad, and in fact the only thing that’s actually “inherited” in this situation is the fucking “genes” and “genetics” of a person, not the intrinsics of “nature”, but don’t tell that to these stupid fucks, even though over the years “studies” have not been able to get the story straight on this subject — one moment it “carbohydrates”, the next it’s “sugar” and next it’s “sweetened drinks”. Like I said before, this issue for me is not about what I eat or my favorite food or anything like that, it’s about exposing stupidity, providing context and reality. I don give a fuck if it’s economics, I don’t give a fuck if it’s video games, I don’t give fuck if it’s religion, I don’t; give fuck if it’s in science and I don’t give a fuck if it’s about health. Fact is, the utter incompetence on this issue is what’s really unhealthy.

Then we have this claim “it’s refined sugar”; “refined” sugar my fucking shxx. There is no “huge” difference between the “refined sugar” and the “sugar” in natural crops. Some sources might say there is, but not according to how the body reacts to the “sugar” in both in the same exact way in diabetics. I don’t just utter “common sense” and catchphrases to get my point across, I use competence and real substantive substantiations to disprove the gimmicks of incompetence.