Comments [RAW Edition]

๐ŸŽ‰โฑKool Sporadic Klockโฑ๐ŸŽ‰

2021-10-25T08:10:00

  days

  hours  minutes  seconds

until

WarStar Drops More Facts



  • ๐Ÿ“ŒTechnical Hitch [RESOLVED]๐Ÿ“Œ

    This is an update to this prior notification:
    https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/2021/10/16/recent-technical-hitch/

    Hahaha, so recently I stated that I had an issue with Windows (specifically on Windows 10) pertaining to sudden freezing and crashing issues that was causing alot of [in]stability issues. I knew that it most likely had something to do with a Windows Update probably not installing well because of the fact that the issue only started happening shortly *after I installed a Windows 10 update, so I don’t think that was a coincidence; after all, things don’t always run smoothly on computers and there have been a ton of times where something was updating or installing on my computer, and for some reason it just doesn’t complete; the installation would become stuck or frozen in time, with no other option than to terminate the process and start fresh all-over-again, with the hope that the same issue doesn’t reoccur, and 99% of the time I can be sure that installation errors were not due to something I did because typically I would let certain programs install without doing anything, or having anything else opened or operating on the computer, while they are installing. See the thing is for me, is that i’m not using the best and greatest hardware at this time. The desktop computer I have is very old and is using very dated technology, so while updates of a certain nature wouldn’t be an issue for most modern computers (especially high-end ones), this is not the case when you are using older computers, and in most cases, it is not advisable to update certain programs on dated systems because while updating would be good for maintaining a reliable operating environment within the program itself, this does not mean that it would necessarily be cooperative with certain types of physical technologies or hardware that are not supported (or properly supported) by the program that you are updating. This is why I often didn’t have windows doing updates in the background without me actually keeping an eye on exactly what is being “updated” because it might “update” something that the CPU, or other key foundations of the system, can’t handle. The CPU that I am using is a 2010 dual-core Pentium E5800 @3.20ghz, and while I am impressed at its raw power and processing capabilities for such an old processor (it has an integrated GPU that’s not even worth mentioning 2021 ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ), it barely has any decent or relevant “instructions sets” or extra 64Bit instruction-set-extensions to keep up with most modern programs and applications (although I think it’s really suffering in the GPU department because the Integrated GPU that it’s using is actually weaker than the one on the Pentium B950 that was in my Sony Vaio laptop). It just basically has the barebones “minimum” required, to execute basic 64bit processes and that’s about it. I learned this the hard way when I realized that I can’t even run RPG Maker MV and alot of other programs (and games) that I used on my Sony Vaio Pentium B950 laptop, before that laptop got damaged by a power surge following a storm, and failed to even power-on ever since, but that is a different story for another time.

    So taking a look at the main issue at hand, I realized that whenever the issue occured, the first thing to cease functioning was the “Taskbar” — upon entering my windows profile, everything loaded up well initially, but then a few minutes later the “freezing” event would start and I would no longer be able to click icons on the Taskbar. Then the next thing that follows would be the desktop itself exhibiting the same issue, where, I would be able to click and open files on the desktop for a few minutes, but then nothing works and then I won’t be able to actually click on anything. So ofcourse you can imaging that this was extremely annoying, especially when what would happen is that I would already have certain files opened or programs opened, but after some time, when I go to close them, they would not close and this is terrible if you are making documents and if you are writing up ideas and stuff, only to discover that most, if not all, of that data might not save because the program is pretty much unresponsive but in a bizarre way, this could mean that your data isn’t going to save, or worse, it could become “corrupted” in the event that it’s been damaged by this bizarre technical issue. Thankfully none of my documents and other material that were in use at the time of the sudden malfunctions were corrupted.

    After suspecting that it may be an update that caused the issue, I decided to see what I can do in the Windows Services panel to, perhaps, disable certain Windows services that are associated with windows updates and so on, but really and truly the damage had already been done so this would only have served to probably prevent things from getting worse if anything — I still did it “just in case”. The issue however still persisted and I was thinking that somehow, widows may have still been “updating” or “configuring” stuff with the help of the internet, so this is what gave me the idea to disable the internet completely and see what happens; to my surprise, it worked. Throughout the entire duration of my internet being off, the issue did not occur; the taskbar and desktop didn’t crash or freeze up as long as the internet was unplugged, and over the course of some time, I had reconnected and disconnected the internet and compared the results, and it was the same consistent outcome. The issue did not happen when the internet was disabled.

    But I couldn’t just let it stop there and had to find a way that I could use the computer with the internet “enabled” but prevent the bizarre issue from occurring again. So while I was troubleshooting the issue, I decided to exploit one of its strange aspects to my advantage; see, I had noticed that typically when this particular system failure happens, programs that were opened before the error occurs, were still functional to a degree, so I came up with the idea to open up “Task Manager” to sort of see if I can maybe, via a process of elimination, close or shut down certain applications that may be contributing to the disruption — this didn’t seem to get me that far with the first set of processes that I messed around with, but since I figured that the Taskbar and other things on the desktop may start being responsive again if I did a restart of “Windows Explorer”, I decided to take advantage of the “Task Manager” which was still responsive (since it’s a program that was opened and still somewhat functional even after the bizarre error was in full effect), to locate the “Windows Explorer” process and “restart” it to see what would happen, and low and behold, when I clicked on the Taskbar after a Windows Explorer restart, the program icons became responsive to clicks-of the-mouse again, and I was abe to actually use said programs and apps that I had “pinned” to it. What’s more, is that all of the files on the desktop became usable again, and apparently, I was able to regain full control of the system. Yes, very bizarre but that’s just how it worked ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚.

    Results proved that I was on to something, so I stuck with that method for a while and, over the course of a few hours (actually that’s what it seemed like but the reality was probably more like 1 hour & 30 minutes to 2 hours at max), I was signing out of my profile and going back in and using the same procedure every time the system crashed and became unresponsive with Task Manager opened, and the results were always consistent, where a “restart” of Windows Explorer, made things function again. But I arrived at an odd situation where the system would freeze and fuck-up (pardon my language ๐Ÿคญ๐Ÿ˜‚) even after I had previously restarted Windows Explorer successfully, and for a brief moment, I was unable to really understand why and then I realized that whenever I had restarted Windows Explorer successfully and it started working again, but then also opened up “Microsoft Edge“, this is where the system would once again crash LOL. So rather than closing other programs, I decided to only shutdown Microsoft Edge but leave other programs opened and operating to see what the outcome would be, and as it turns out, with nothing else but Microsoft Edge “closed”, the system ran without fail hahaha. Every time I signed out of my windows profile, and logged back in, everything functioned well until I actually launched Microsoft Edge; whenever I would launch Microsoft Edge apparently this was responsible for the crashing of my windows operations, and once again, this only started happening *after the “Windows 21H1 – 19043.1237 – Windows Feature Experience Pack 120.2212.3530.0” update on my 2010 Veriton Intel Pentium E5800-based system, at the time of this posting.

    After being able to pin-down a solid source of influence over the issue by determining that Microsoft Edge was part of the problem, I shifted my attention to doing what I can do with Microsoft Edge to see if I could manage it in such a way that it won’t crash my system. So I started off with something basic, which was to close as much tabs as possible to see what influence that would have on the error because, in the Task Manager, I noticed that Microsoft Edge was pretty heavy on the resources mainly due to the fact that I had about 400+ tabs opened up (which was not an issue before the update). It was more accurately about 400+ tabs stored in the session but most of them were not actually “active“. I ultimately saved all of the tabs with the help of a handy extension so that I would only be left with atleast 1 or-so tabs opened, and after that, the issue ceased to exist and from then-on I was able to use windows without this annoying issue happening again. I have actually reenabled Windows Updates once more, so we will see how that goes but I suspect that as long as I don’t have too many tabs in Edge opened up, I should be good for the time being, although, I still think that the original cause of this particular system error may be due to the fact that the Windows 21H1 update is not installed properly on my computer and may need reinstalling.

    I have good reason to believe so because of the fact that my computer had become unresponsive and hanged a couple of times during certain phases of this update and had become stuck and “frozen” upon reaching up to a certain percentage of completion where it would just hang and never complete installation causing me to have to hold the power button down and force a shutdown-and-reboot of the computer.


    • COMMENT [823]

      This session is loosely based on this script: https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/?p=6995

      We must pay attention to what GOD says because GOD keeps his word, GOD’s words define a person, GOD made humans in his image, so it’s quit silly that there are notions that seek to undermine this by suggesting that there is any greater image that anyone can bow to or pray to that represents “GOD“. The image of GOD cannot be fashioned by the hands of mankind through physical objects.

      The one and only true GOD is not even a physical being — we must show appreciation to GOD through the image of the heart which is within (love); physical objects are just distractions, we can’t physically see GOD on our own, so when we close our eyes to pray to GOD acknowledging that we are in HIS image, this is a meaningful show of reverence because it is sacrificing your conscience’s urge to give *attention to the material things that you are surrounded by and, instead, devote your complete awareness to the Almighty who is superior to the dust of crafted objects. Some people have it twisted; we can’t create an image of GOD, GOD created us in his image, so with all of our being we should dedicate our lives to appreciating life — praising and bowing to silly inanimate life-less objects, forded by the flesh and used as manipulation, is a fucking gimmick. GOD’s word is a direct calling, the only word that matters above all, is his.

      Deceptive fucks have “lost” their half-wit minds; full-blown facts win easily over fuckry ๐Ÿ‘Š๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ˜œ

    • COMMENT [822]

      “Removing” sugar from diets on the basis of facilitating weight loss, *does not work. “Cutting out sugar” strictly for this purpose *is not realistic, that’s just a bullshit placebo like I have said in past sessions. The body stores food that it cannot fully process, so therefore the less of it that you eat, is the less of it that your body has to try and properly manage. This all adds up when you see the kinds of habits and practices that are actually making people lose weight, as well as take note of the flip side of when some people gain it back. Even the scriptures in the bible warns against *gluttony.

      And I must remind people that this is a much broader issue than about what I or anyone likes to eat and their preferences. This is about getting out the facts and correcting what some of these fools manage to fuck up; that’s what these sessions are really about and the purpose of bringing these issues to the surface.

      Sugar does not “convert” into fat; some bird-brains in the media and in the health space, are just trying to “convert” their incompetent shock garbage into reality.

      I back FACTS for the “win” because clowns “lost” me with their trite fuckry ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ‘Š. #Accuracy #Versatility #PowerStriker

    • COMMENT [821]

      You may hear the stories of those who conveniently claim to be “addicted” to something — just replace the word “addiction” with “irresponsibility“, in which case the word “addiction” is often the politically-correct way of framing silliness in stead of “irresponsible”, by those who claim to have an “addiction” to habitual toxicity, and it’ll all contextually fall into place.

      Replace the word “sugar” with “overeating” and the context of obesity will also fall into place. There are those who insist “sugar” is responsible for “obesity” but they are fools trying to sound intelligent. These silly “studies” now-a-days are just shit-head narratives trying to sound factual. The facts still remain that nobody has ever lost weight by just removing sugar from food, or have gained weight by just adding sugar to edibles and drinkables. Sugar’s relation to obesity is like “evolution”, a bullshit myth; lots of “links” but no real connection.

      With me it’s facts for the win because I fail too see the relevance in fuckry ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜Ž. #KorrektiveKounteracter #ContextCritical

      ———————————————————————————————–

      • COMMENT [820]
        Here is the unrealistic thing for me concerning the notion about the ancient people, and the so-called “UFOs” they were in possession of. These were people that were all over the place throughout their ancient terraces and beyond (in the case of a few); they had sandals and all kinds of footwear because they knew that … Continue reading COMMENT [820]
      • COMMENT [819]
        There is no such thing as “junk food”, and the issue of weight gain is not people not having proper access to “healthier options“; the issue originates from the very fact that (in regard to certain varieties of edibles), THEY admit that THEY can’t put it down. If THEY can’t bring themselves to put it down, … Continue reading COMMENT [819]
      • COMMENT [818]
        We sometimes see clueless sources, apparently individuals in certain institutions whose life mission is to spread foolishness like “obesity is a sugar problem”, always looking to claim that something else is the problem other than a lack of self-control, and this is perhaps why the “obesity” situation is out-of-control because according to their ever “evolving” and … Continue reading COMMENT [818]
      • COMMENT [817]
        Let me tell you all what I meant by evolution not being considerate, in relation to a previous session I did concerning the same views. See, evolution functions on a go-with-the-flow kind of disposition; it’s an “every man for themself”, short-sighted day-to-day, dog-eats-dog, “supreme genes” kind of philosophy. But when you take in all of the … Continue reading COMMENT [817]
      • COMMENT [816]
        This is just for emphasis; there have been, and still are, centenarians living for eons who did not follow a strict weight-loss or weight-prevention diet, and yet they lived (and live) long, healthy and prosperous lives. They were on the sugar, they were on the salt, they were on the meat and they were on the … Continue reading COMMENT [816]
      • COMMENT [815]
        Unlike what you may have heard in the mainstream media, when it comes to the issue of sugar and weight-gain, I know it is a fact that weight-gain is triggered by *overeating, I am also able to tell first-hand the kinds of effects i’m experiencing because of my first-hand experience with my intake of sugar over … Continue reading COMMENT [815]

      The Staple Spot, where the current crop of [recent] comprehensive comments are contained ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿ˜Ž

      ———————————————————–

      Kritical Ninja: Kritically Korrekt Kontent that astronomically improves!. 

When i'm wrong i'm wrong, but when i'm correct, i'm critically correct.

      When i’m wrong i’m wrong, but when i’m korrekt it’s KRITICAL asf, or in this case ASTRONOMICAL :D

      ———————————————————–

      • COMMENT[28]

        Originally Posted: 2017/08/29 at 10:52 am

        hahaha that Mayweather vs Mcgregor fight was actually very good, it was pretty sensational. most people agree that they did not disappoint. I think Mcgregor could have done a little better if he had worked himself more leading up to the fight, because he did show alot of potential, and Mayweather was outstanding especially considering his age and more importantly that he had not been the ring competitively for a significant time โ€” all in all it was fantastic.

        Nobody was trying to hear that other weak crap critics were bitching and babbering about xD. Fact is, it was awesome and epic history was made on the 26st. Nuff said.

      • COMMENT[27]

        Originally Posted: 2017/08/26 at 1:59 pm

        Iโ€™m completely opposite of the critics, Iโ€™m seeing that Conor/Floyd showdown later xD. I donโ€™t give 1 โ€“ 3 fucks, itโ€™s a classic bitch! โ€” I see what i want to see and be apart of what i want to be apart of, thatโ€™s the bottom line for me ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘. Some people ride dick and suck dick, iโ€™m not in that shitty leagueโ—โ—โ—, iโ€™m a different person all together ๐Ÿ’ฏ. You gotta be out of your bird-shit fucking mind to be a fanboy for some crap like this xD.

      • COMMENT[26]

        Originally Posted: 2017/08/25 at 10:06 am

        The stuff between mcgregor and mayweather is perhaps one for the record books!, because like I said before, this is not an average celebrity boxing match. I mean, it is a boxing match, except involving two highly skilled persons, so donโ€™t fuck yourself thinking that it isnโ€™t โ€” it pretty much is because of the circumstances that were agreed too, but itโ€™s not just about whoโ€™s the better fighter, most of us can โ€œassumeโ€ which one is the โ€œgeneralโ€ better โ€œfighterโ€, but thatโ€™s boooooorrring! :D.

        It goes alot deeper than that in this case, itโ€™s pretty much Mcgregor thinking that heโ€™s just better than floyd, and that heโ€™s so exceptional that he can beat Mayweather even at his own game, these are the real contentious undertones that really set this whole scenario off, and obviously floyd isnโ€™t having that, Floyd doesnโ€™t accept that! lol.

        As to the type of match it is, realistically it is a boxing competition and you just have plain unrealistic bullshit expectations if youโ€™re not expecting the better boxer or boxing to do anything in this context that will actually count. You can think whatever you want about this, but itโ€™s all in your head at this point considering what the reality of the situation has worked out to be, period!. you might as well save your time and miserable existence if you still assert otherwise as facts.

        So it is what it is, and not what you wish it to be. And my outlook of the situation is that regardless of what the fuck itโ€™s being seen as, either side cannot be dumb enough to underestimate the other side, and given the fact that this is set to be โ€œboxingโ€, you cannot expect anyone careless to the principles established here, after an utter dismantle, to not be utterly discredited and dismissed as the biggest fucking joke in history, not knowing what this situation really is, and I donโ€™t think thatโ€™s the case here with with floyd or conor, hey know what they are doing, and alot of folks like myself are certainly not clueless to what this event is. Also the truth is, Floyd and Mcgregor is what it comes down too because they are the ones making history, since they are the actual fighters, every thing else is just an โ€œopinionโ€ derived from imagination :D.

      • COMMENT[25]

        Originally Posted: 2017/08/24 at 9:35 am

        See the Mcgregor Vs Mayweather for what it is โ€” this is that krazy shit โ€ผ๏ธโœŠ. This is NOT your average played-out, run-of-the-mill, mediocre event ๐Ÿ‘Ž. This is the definition of epic โšก๐Ÿ”ฅ, this is a once in a life time kind of legacy. Fuck everything else thatโ€™s going on, NOTHING compares hahaa ๐Ÿ‘Œ๐Ÿ‘Œ.

      This is the official comment area where I just drop comments in the comments place below :D. It says RAW in the title so it’s strictly what I have to say about stuff and it’s not always going to be “pretty” LOL.

      Old Intentions – LOL – Things Change

      604 thoughts on “Comments [RAW Edition]

      1. One thing folks need to realize, if you haven’t noticed this by now like I have been noticing recently when I had thought about the issue, is that along with the reality of modern humans being shown to have actually co-existed with neanderthals, modern humans are also linked to neandethals via DNA as well — modern humans, or some modern humans, actually “share” a very significant degree of neanderthal DNA — significant in the context that any trace of neanderthal D.N.A present in humans alive today in-of-itself is significant considering what’s being touted that the sumerian texts state, which again, shows that our origins are almost as old as they were, from a historical perspective, this pulls into question, the accuracy atleast, of the sumerian accounts of human origins because like I said before, nowhere in the sumerian culture was there any mention of prehistoric humans — they didn’t mention the prehistoric humans, or even depicted these prehistoric beings in their sculptures, carvings or drawn illustrations, some of who seemed to have still been walking on earth in certain places even around that time.

        This looks as if the sumerian culture was only established “between” certain time-periods and eras of earth’s entire history, they do not appear to have been truly here from the beginning like some insist, and they certainly were not the last ancient culture or the first set of humans on earth, even the ancient egyptians who co-existed with ancient sumeria/sumer, were the last true ancient civilization left standing until the ancient romans etc came around — maybe some sort of early “advanced civilization” established itself in that area, but that’s certainly not where earth’s true legacy began, which is a side-note, but never-the-less it’s like they (meaning the sumerians) did not even know about these particular group of humans, or who to me atleast were different ethnic types and groups of humans regardless of how “primitive” they were said to have been. I don’t get into the dating thing often but if that’s going to be used to establish a case for the sumerian artifacts and how their tablets and stuff predate the bible, and what the tablets are supposedly claiming, according to people who claimed to have translated their accounts, then I’m going to also use the carbon-dating thing to establish a factual case of where human history truly stands in all reality.

        Now it’s been claimed that “ape” D.N.A was mixed with sumerian “minor-god” D.N.A to make humans, atleast that’s what the folks who claimed to have translated their writings claim that the writings dictate, but that is very debatable and very suspicious because why do we have the presence of prehistoric human D.N.A in the genes of some modern humans when these things were in no way shape or form even apart of the sumerian accounts of modern human origins, yet they seem to date back far older than the sumerian culture and should not have existed according to the origins of humanity, according to the sumerian culture. Like I said before when you take into account everything biological that’s been found physically, such as all the remains of very old humans and also signs that there was actual human activity on earth before the sumerian “civilization” showed up, it is very clear that human origins did not establish in Mesopotamia from no damn aliens — it’s like they did not even know about these neanderthals and did not even really know much about the dinosaurs, all of which date back millions of years before they showed up, so these sumerian things were not the true creators of life on earth, much less their own fucking lives :D.

        I ain’t take no collage-league classes or courses for this, this is just basic fucking sense and skillful thinking. It’s like when somebody tells you something that doesn’t add-up — I can see-through bullshit, so these are my thoughts on the aspects — this is instinctual to me. my knack to refute bullshit come natural. It naturally breaks down to, just 50% of focus, 30% of my bravery, 10% of my commitment, and just 10% of my focused = 100%. Ratios and related traits change according to issue.

        Like

      2. There is a number of ways you can see an issue and handle an issue, but you know me I don’t deal with no stupid impractical philosophy, or “politics” and things like that; I deal with realistic wisdom, and ideal-ideas and help folks to see things a bit clearer when context is being distorted.

        These [ideal] ways IS to be direct, specific, and intrinsically INSIGHTFUL which is the trait of a visionary — philosophy is a trap and a cycle of abstracts. Some folks spend alot of time in convolution but they can’t properly grasp reality. The truth is the truth, every other shit is just a different form if fucking ignorance. Fuck all this “philosophy” crap; I help people to realize what the fuck is actually going on, this is called R.E.A.L.I.T.Y.

        There is too much abundance of bullshit creating a fog of impractical fallacies; fuck “philosophizing”, this thing for me is of a very low priority, i’m only interested in the real deal. On realistic issues, “philosophy” is top-brand “filler”; time to get back telling-it-like-it-is, raw and explicit, straight to the fucking point PERIOD!. #๐Ÿ’ฏ%

        Like

      3. Plot Twist: It’s Neanderthals that created modern-humans ๐Ÿค” ๐Ÿ˜„

        Alot of people are searching for the “missing link”, but was missing the neanderthal’s point all-along. Einstein is practically rolling around in his grave with a partially intact hominid.

        #JustJoking

        Like

      4. On the health tip; avoid eating “raw” food, cook the meat and cook the vegetables that require cooking (like potatoes, pumpkin, squash and all the other very hard kinds of vegetables), they are much much more nutritious when they are cooked, and they taste 10 times better.

        Avoid extreme diets, alot of diets out there being promoted are totally pointless and redundant. Many of these nuts on Chauvinistic Deist are just surviving mainly because they are eating something, and they probably tell you just what they want to tell you for the sake of upholding an image, but they probably have loads of other stuff stacked away that they stuff themselves with, when the camera stops rolling.

        A balanced diet is the smartest most intelligent and basic way to go; stop dwelling too much on these crappy studies and freaks and their weird diets — the results of what I have recommended to you speak for themselves. Never mind this misleading hogwash about sugar is bad for you and is responsible for weight gain — only very stupid people perpetuate this dogma. Sugar in food does not cause obesity.

        Again, I have nothing to hide, I have years and years worth of consistent health results to show for my lifestyle, and I’m not on any weird shitty diets. There are some insecure individuals that just have to be on some kind of “diet”, that’s just how they are, but i’m not nearly any of these people — thy try to come up with all of these fancy diets and eating trends and so-on, but the reality is, sometimes the most effective course of action comes down to the very basic ones, and I have not been on a fancy or strict extreme diet, and i’m doing very well — all of the fucking clothes I have owned for many years still fit me, so I have nothing to hide or any reason to lie; I am extremely happy with my health and I am someone who is no stranger to sugar, and I know for a fact based on real results that I see for myself every day, that this thing about sugar being the cause of weight-gain is absolutely fuckry of the most potent kind, and is extremely easy to debunk.

        Don’t get caught up with all of that scientific lingo they try to convolute the matter with, it is actually quite super easy to prove that “added sugar” does not cause obesity; maybe in the scrambled minds of some eggheaded fucks, but not in reality.

        Be aware that many folks out there are on useless fad diets — on the surface they appear well and good, but that’s the cookie-cut image they present — you truly don’t know what these folks may be doing when they are not in the spotlight, alot of these folks experiment with alot of B.S and then exercise to gain a shiny exterior, to gloss over the fact their interior is barely keeping it together; i don’t “exercise” very often and i’m actually surprised with the kind of athletic physique I have been able to maintain for years, naturally. I was very active as a child and was always running around and playing cops-and-robbers-like game, and tag-you’re-it, and play-fighting aswell as actual sports like track-and-field, football etc, not to mention ride around on my bicycle and things like that, and I still played alot of video games.

        That was when I was a kid, and I did those those kinds of activities because they were things I genuinely had an interest in and loved to do; it was not forced or activity I had to be forced to do. Now-a-days, I mainly got alot of activity by doing lots of everyday stuff, I rarely have to go out of my way to do a ton of exercising, and most folks are typically active in their day-to-day lives, it’s not that they don’t get that much activity, the issue is the diet since the gene that is responsible for weight game is very sensitive ; this goes back to what I have said in one of my recent sessions on this topic, where I made the point that even if you are exercising, if you go back with the same eating habits, it would pretty much cancel-out all of your efforts you’re doing through exercising or being active — you need to compliment your work-out and activity with a great balanced diet, if not, all of that exercising you are doing and being active is going to be futile, and you’re just going to be putting pointless strain on your body and it’s only going to be a matter of time before something still fails/malfunctions.

        What folks need to understand, is that having hulk-sized muscular growth is not natural, and is not necessarily a sign of overall robust health; there has been many folks who worked-out and appeared to have large muscles etc that had suffered heart-attacks and strokes, much like some of these individuals on these weird diets, who appear to have good exteriors but that only because the “exercising” they do just temporarily masks the chronic self-inflicted mess they are creating under the surface — I don’t exercise that much and I still maintain a good slim size and athletic body-type and that’s because this is how I naturally am, this is not a temporary mask or a guise.

        Bottomline is, moderation is the key, and I have not personally seen anything, in all of my years dealing with plenty of sugar, that sugar is an ingredient that causes weight gain, and have actually seen alot that indicates to me that weight gain might actually be a chronic genetic condition and not just a simple matter of “processed/junk foods” or “too much sugar”.

        Like

      5. Factually speaking there is just no way that neanderthal D.N.A should have been found in modern human D.N.A and we have every sort of circumstantial clue to establish that humans go way back in time — humans didn’t just pop-up on earth in sumeria. Some “advanced civilization” just popped-up in sumeria [depending on how you look at it], but human-activity on earth has been around for much-MUCH-much! longer and the closer you look at the issue, you start to see a picture developing of how there were apparently actually different groups of human forms being discovered all over the place on earth, once again pre-dating and far-exceeding human activity in sumeria.

        These weren’t evolved animals, these where different groups of humans living on earth in different areas of earth before some of them actually converged and crossed paths millions of years ago in the past, which shows a level of diversity of indigenous ancestors that had been around on earth for eons!, it did not start in sumeria; I don’t know what kind of civilization popped up there [in sumeria], but I know that humanity did not just start in sumeria and actually seems to have originated in climates or zones that are native to certain parts of africa plus the fact that you are finding alot of very prehistoric biological human deposits in that area of africa; not in sumeria.

        You’re also not finding alot of these prehistoric human deposits around gold mines, or any “mines” — these folks did not seem to be that interested in digging for no damn gold — at the time humans supposedly popped-up in sumeria, these dudes were playing around with stone tools, ambushing wildlife, and scrawling paintings on stone structures, which is all “above-ground” activity.

        There is still much opportunity for them to have discovered “precious metals” and precious-materials and stuff with all of the cataclysmic disasters and things of that nature that went on in certain areas — with the subsequent displacement of the earth’s crust and land-mass rising up out of the ocean and stuff, they could have stumbled upon anything at that point with that kind of turbulence and displacement and friction re-occurring over a 110-million-year long period and such — they didn’t necessarily have to go digging with technology to discover “gold” and “silver” and other things depending on what was going on in earth’s ancient history, in certain areas .

        Depending on the kind of catastrophic damage and what-not that was done to the earth’s surface etc, some of these chemicals and exotic materials could have been pushed to the surface and exposed in some capacity at various intervals in earth’s history like “Yellowstone” National Park in Montana and Idaho for example, but what the fuck is the “D.N.A” of “pre-historic humans” doing mixed with the D.N.A of humans around today?, this should not be there, this shows that many of these groups co-existed at some point and that human history goes further back in time than we seem to think, and that more importantly, Neanderthals are more in common with humans because of how humans interacted with this group in the past which lead to traces of their D.N.A found in the genes of humans still alive now, and vice-versa.

        The sumerian texts specifically made reference to an “animal” in the sequence that some interpreters are saying was supposed to be the creation of modern humans, these [sumerian] people’s accounts did not acknowledge no kind of human beings ever existing prior to that, they did not “modify” already-existing-on-earth “humanoids”, that’s bullshit; they specifically stated that they fused animal D.N.A with the D.N.A of a “minor god” (these “minor-gods” absolutely did not look like no fucking neanderthal, because again, they actually depicted illustrations of these beings involved in the scenario that they specifically meant on their tablets and other stone artifacts), and did modifications in that process so that humans would “come into existence with the ability to walk upright like them”, they did not know about these fucking already upright walking prehistoric humans (the so-called neanderthals), which puts a huge hole in what the fuck is being claimed that their (sumerian) texts are recollecting about human history.

        “Upright” walking beings did not pre-exist on the earth when they arrived and made modern man according to them, yet by what has been discovered in reality certainly proved this not to be the case — so the notion that they modified “existing humans but just to be ‘more advanced'” is not true. The actual facts discovered about human migration and settlements is shredding this case about how “just more advanced” humans popped-up in “sumer” to bits on closer insection due to the fact that, according to the sumerian texts, there was no other “less advanced humans” on earth, there were only “gods” like themselves, some which were “minor gods” and some which were “non-minor” gods, 1 of which they took D.N.A/blood from to create the first and only humans, not “advanced humans”, we were supposed to be the first and only humans according to them.

        So some of the most compelling facts is actually coming from here on earth, which is a reality that’s very underrated these days because fucks forgot the basics — not far-far out in space; just on closer inspection of the circumstances and direct facts traced all over the place, except sumeria, often by just using a little vigilance. Fact is, some of the greatest lessons of our lives are bound internally, not externally, we need to develop inwards so that we can properly branch outwards in our case, in any case.

        Like

      6. Hahaha check this joke out; all this talk about mars this and mars that is total fantasy. They have a much better realistic chance at using the money earned from such a massive clickbait to fund other “missions” to other parts of space, which is probably what they are going to do because they seem to need the money that bad, than they do successfully making mars livable for humans — all this clickbait crap speculating about “making mars habitable” is just delusional folks trying to play god, and we all know what happens when humans try to play GOD — they fuck themselves severely.

        Check this out, there are more than enough deserts here on earth, that have a capacity to support millions and millions of populous, and yet we have the spectacle of a set of time wasting, money wasting fools looking to go up to “mars” to turn mars into a livable habitat like earth, meanwhile they can’t even get the deserts that are currently here on earth, to transform into habitable areas; nobody is even realizing this but they are going to expect that somehow these fools are going to be able to turn mars into a habitable planet LOL. We’re not even talking about a few deserts here on planet earth that none of these people want to touch, they’re talking about an entire different fucking planet, in a much worst and way more arid condition, that they expect to transform into a second earth-like place, yet they can’t even fuck with the deserts here on this planet.

        These motherfuckers and the people that believe in this garbage are beyond fucking stupid — they are unrealistic as fuck. They have the book knowledge, but not much else xD. Lets see these folks trying to mimic GOD, transform any one of these fucking deserts here on earth first, into a lush green tropics, even in the slightest, and then talk to me about transforming an entire different planet that actually is in a WORST state. Otherwise you’d probably be highly unwise to take any of these fools seriously with this alien fantasy crap, that only works in the movies for obvious reasons.

        I think that to even consider such a project of going to another planet to transform it into a habitable place that would be similar to earth, there should be a requirement that you would have to had transformed atleast one desert on earth into a habitable area first to see if this stuff is even remotely accomplishable in favorable circumstances in your own backyard, or if the whole thing is just a big pointless exercise in futility, which, it damn well seems like to me.

        I’m totally sorry for the people who are gullible enough to fall for this rip-off counterfeit earth project, but certainly not “shocked”. It’s right up there with “Illuminati” and secret society silliness and we know that there are a-whole-lot of folks who believe is that fodder. Scratch that, I meant to say; BULLSHIT.

        Like

      7. YO! we need to pay attention to the fact that the sumerian texts and illustrations that they made do not make any reference to the neanderthals and prehistoric humans in any way shape or form, so what I’m saying is, it is like they did not know about prehistoric humans, so this is where the sumerian text gets kind of shakey, in that, how can modern humans have a percentage of neanderthal D.N.A, when we were said to have been created only by the mixture of gods and ape genes which is often claimed by many of those who profess to be knowledgeable about the translations of those texts?; this is not a matter of they “misunderstood technology”, or that “they lacked the words to describe what the heck they were seeing”, NO they literally drew and carved and sculpted the two key specific specimens that they took D.N.A samples from to create modern humans that the folks who study the translations are stating that the translation state, and that said translations are detailing about those illustrations that the sumerians designed to go along with whatever scenario they were trying to depict, in which case the professors are claiming were depictions of the process of human creation.

        The scenario of the creation of humans according to the sumerians [according to the translated versions], and more importantly the illustrations that the sumerians drew that were said to represent that important scenario, involved a mixture of god and animal (ape) genes to create humans; there was no depiction or mention of any other life forms selected as part of the process, or that any other life-form similar to humans existed on earth before humans, that could have even been considered to be selected for the process, hence why they had used animal and god genes to create humans as the first of their kind on earth. So what I’m saying is that this does not look good for the credibility of the sumerian texts and its accuracy as the real history of mankind, especially when you factor in all of the biological discoveries that suggest that there was plenty of human activity even dating back to TIMES that modern humans should not have existed in yet; in PLACES that modern human ancestors should not have existed in yet according to some people’s interpretations of the sumerian texts and what it allegedly says about human history.

        So lets keep examining and questioning these sumerian records, and the inconsistencies being revealed shall we?. The fucking plot thickens :D.

        Like

      8. Back at it again with my crazy fucking self sharing more of my crazy fucking views on interesting things; not giving a basic fuck about a bum bitch’ irrelevant diagnosis, because it’s fun to get to know the motherfucking truth! — i’m crazy for the truth :D. #ThumbsUp

        There is a number of times when it is suggested about ancient history that they lacked the ability to accurately describe what they were seeing, so most likely what they were seeing in some respects was “technology”, even though to my mind alot of what we speak today actually originated from back then, and it has just become different ways to say certain things because of the different languages that developed, but developed ways improved overtime which we still all commonly use to define and describe the same exact things. So the ancients could not have been entirely clueless about distinguishing certain things just because their words were different in describing these things.

        So in reality, I don’t know what technology some of these practitioners are talking about. Some folks that have an interest in ancient history claim sometimes that because their own minds get tied-up looking at some of the things the ancient people described in a literal sense, that it seems to make more sense [to them] when they look at it as technology, and because of this, it’s the ancients that didn’t know what they were talking about and that they “misunderstood” technology and their own experiences, but that’s the HUGE problem, just because it makes more sense to you as technology because you don’t understand it otherwise, doesn’t mean what you’re saying is accurate or true, because all you’re doing is dumbing-it-down and in the process might be taking alot of things out of context; that’s not necessarily getting people any closer to the true meaning of what the ancients were talking about, and it does not mean they did not understand what they were talking about; they could have gotten plenty of enlightenment over the course of time as to what they were literally seeing, so I don’t really believe that most of the things they depicted were not literally what they really saw or knowingly wanted to show, and that infact, it’s just percieved by some as “ignorance” possibly because of reasons WE still don’t fully understand, not them.

        The truth is that some of these things they spoke about, may have been meant as-is because they might not have been all depicting true situations that actually occurred; some of these things might have actually been just stories or just products of creative exercise, or cultural products of ancient architecture and the way that they typically designed their facilities and what not to, in some cases; attract people or as a badge of prestige or traditional customs and things like that.

        Like

      9. Once again it’s more of me, keeping people up-to-date with the facts and reality. Much of these so-called UFOs i’ve seen don’t look like nothing represented as aliens in spaceships illustrated in blockbuster movies; and they actually tend to have “phenomenal” attributes, in that, they look like anomalous “phenomena” than things that are “crafted” or “molded” or “melded”, and this realization makes realistic sense because we’re talking about real life, and real occurrences in real life, not anti-religious fuckry made up to be in a fucking show.

        I’m not really freaked-out by the thought of “aliens” in the slightest, I just think that referring to alot of these things as “aliens” is just kind of stupid, i’m not really concerned about aliens and “national security” and things like that. That’s not my job, i’m concerned about some jackasses in these institutions or somewhere else creating a mess, so i’m not focused on no damn aliens being a “threat” — i’m not concerned about the “aliens”; the aliens, actually the UFOs, don’t give a fuck, they clearly do not give a fuck — it’s the set of nimrods and jackasses down on earth that we should be paying attention too, because this is where the usual fuck-ups come from; fools down here, not no aliens in aircrafts. Don’t take my word for it, look up history.

        The UFOs seem to have more damn sense to-be-honest, which is very IMPRESSIVE; not the speculated “technology” or whatever, but just this fact alone and how they can actually handle so much capability without creating some kind of feeble “doomsday” disaster, like some of the fucking fools who call themselves “officials” and leaders — is impressive and laughable, NOT scary.

        It shows that despite alot of our technological-advancements, motherfuckers still have alot to learn, and maybe motherfuckers can actually learn alot from these fucking UFOs, just maybe because the brain density in some of these clowns, is completely devoided.

        But i’m not freaked-out by shit, i’m genuinely interested in what these things are, what they are doing and what we might possibly be able to learn from these phenomenons since the incredible integrity these things seem to have, with the power they possess, makes some asswipes just look like a bullshit waste of space. I’m more impressed at these UFOs than in am in some people — they look GODLY in contrast to the worth of cow-manure clogging up the fucking system.

        Nothing to be fucking afraid of, we can learn from the ways of the UFOs really-and-truly, because they look like men of GOD compared to the big clueless jackasses plaguing some of these institutions. So i’m not wary about the “UFOs”, i’m more dumbfounded by the nefarious piss infesting society with their filth, who makes these “UFOs” look like geniuses and goddamn saints — these are the fuckers we need to be watching out for, not “alien invasions”.

        Like

      10. Just speaking some more about UFOs and stuff; what i’m telling you is real facts about these “UFOs” and things of that nature, almost all of them are not “alien” green guys in motherships, this is a fact. They are seen on earth, it’s stupid and misleading to classify something you’re seeing on earth as “alien”, especially in cases where you can even remotely identify what the fuck it is. If you “can’t” identify it, it’s exactly what the fuck it is; a “UFO”. And just because you can’t identify it, this does not mean it is an “alien”; I don’t give two-shits what the “capabilities” are, if you have no proof that it originated from another planet, then it is not an “alien” or an “extraterrestrial” because the FACT is, whatever it is that you have not identified, was seen on earth. So I don’t care where folks are getting the information from — you’re being misled right from the start if someone is trying to tell you that something you saw on earth for a fact, was an alien when there is no proof that it actually originated from outside of the earth.

        Also becareful with the term “aircraft”, if someone tells you they saw a “UFO” and tells you about an “aircraft”, something is wrong — obviously they don’t know what the fuck they are talking about, because by definition an “aircraft” is something “mechanical”; if you have no “proof” that what you’re seeing is technological, or what someone saw is a machine, then it is exactly what the frig it is, it’s a “UFO”, it is not an “aircraft”, by calling it an “aircraft”, it suggests that they have some kind of idea what it is, but if there is nothing they can compare it too, to establish that, then there’s no possible way and there is no credible way that they can conclude that it’s an “aircraft” that they saw.

        It is NOT an aircraft if they can’t prove that it’s mechanical or it’s a machine; it’s cannot be a “UFO” if they CAN establish that it’s an “aircraft”, and I gurentee you that they cannot establish that it’s an “aircraft”. A “UFO” is a “UFO” and an “aircraft” is an “aircraft” — a “UFO” means “unidentified flying object” it has nothing to do with “aircrafts” and just because you cannot identify something, it does not mean it’s an alien. I think to call everything you cannot identify, some “spaceship” or “alien”, is highly silly, especially when what you’re seeing IS on earth and isn’t in space and there is no proof that it actually came form space, of course you can keep an open mind about how it can be “alien” but that is not the point, that still makes it speculation because the FCAT is it was an earthly encounter or sighting. This is what you call “facts”, things that you can prove are facts, all of these things I’m saying to you in this session are facts.

        Some people when they suse the term UFO they mean aliens and spaceships. The term “UFO” has nothing to do with aliens and spaceships; there are no aliens and there are no spaceships. These things were supposed to be on mars — we know for a fact that there is no martians and spaceships on mars — I don’t know how much times these folks need to prove themselves wrong befroe they wake up and realize that space does not need to contain “aliens” based on something as mundane as the “size” of space. So-far, some folks have gotten a taste of this raality by going millions and millions of miles into space, and are seeing first hand that it doesn’t work like this; i do not care what your millitary or government is telling you, or not telling you, since what i’m teaching you is basic sense, and it’s a fact that there is no aliens where scietist thought might have been aliens and “life”; and the term “UFO” does not mean “aliens” and most of the enocunters with so-called UFOs are on earth which IS terresterial not “alien”, and it’s misleading to call something an “aircraft”, when you have no clue what it is and have no proof that it is mechanical or a machine or a device or that it’s even “piloted” or “manned”.

        I do not take alot of these folks serious, they certainly take what they are seeing seriously, that’s clear, so they can have fun with the “UFOs”, I doubt the UFOs give a fuck, needless to say, alot of the stuff these people call UFOs is usually alot of doctored photos and edited footage and CGI etc, and not things that people with a brain cannot see are actually fake and staged things. So they can knock themslevs out and have fun, but some people call everything a damn UFO, and usually it’s just people with alot of time on their hands; it’s not like they are genuingly encountering things they can’t explain, they’re just looking for entertainment on the internet and everything becomes an “alien” in an “aircraft”.

        In other circles things like “aliens” and “technology” are used as religious rebuke, that’s how it originally came about. people came up with this crap of aliens and motherships and aliens and “spacecrafts” and “aircrafts”, as a sidetrack to religion, and try to say that GOD didn’t create life and that it was all “evolution” and there is no such thing as supernatural capabilities involved in our origins; it was “technology. So they all try to take GOD out of the equation by either using the “evolution” rubbish or the “alien” in aircraft rubbish, but all of these gimmicks are one in the same it’s all about denying the existence of supernatural forces and that there is a GOD, although you have to wonder why would anyone be stupid enough to even attempt such a thing when there is tons of supernatural properties accentuating our reality that are plain as day — there are no such things as “aliens” in “aircaft”; a UFO is not a fucking “alien aircraft” and saying that any “unidentified object” equates to an “alien aircraft” is a conspiracy theory, it is not an actual fact. So pretty much that’s the playbook of these anti-religious individuals, i.e it’s either “evolution” or aliens/aircraft with technology.

        Like

      11. There is the notion of the potential of life in other parts of space being very high because of its vastness — see these folks are trying to explain life by the quantity of planets; I don’t think the legacy of life is about the mere quantity of planets, I don’t think that’s the way to explain life, I think the best way to explain life is by the purpose of life, and I don’t see what is the purpose of duplicating life sparsely on other planets. In the context of life, there really is no purpose in doing so; I honestly think if that was meant to be, we would have been seeing that to be the case eons ago.

        It would only make sense to me that there is life on some other planet, if there was some kind of major accident due to a cataclysm that caused major fragmentation, otherwise, I don’t buy into this assumption of life outside of earth’s skies. YES I am not losing any sleep over the fact that there are no “aliens”, I truly am not xD.

        I believe there is a GOD because I would have to be severely misguided and blind to think that life just came out of thin-air as the result of some kind of accidental-friction caused by matter and materials that are lifeless, because we can see through experience that life always comes from life, this is the most consistent fact in history and the being responsible for the existence of [all] with the sacred attribute of “life” and “soul” and “spirit” and “consciousness” cannot be a flesh-and-blood humanoid because of seriously complicated dynamics involved with existence that a flesh-and-blood humanoid characteristic, would not be able to logically subjugate, so i’m not concerned about aliens in spaceships because of the notion that “space is big” at this moment in time; I think the prospect of aliens is like the prospects of “afterlife”, i.e nill. I don’t believe that there is “other life” both in an “underworld” sense (afterlife/life in death), or in an “outer world” sense (alien life etc)

        I’m not saying this because I think the belief in aliens is nonsensical; the topic of aliens is interesting but i’m not looking for what’s just intereting, there is plenty of that to go around, i’m looking at what is realistic. Earth and these other planets have been around for millions and billions of years and not one fucking planet near-by at-all has any fucking life?, not one other fucking planet?, not a single one?, c’mon man this is telling us something.

        Like

      12. Yeah lets get into some of my crazy views about health, if you don’t like it, suck a dick, I don’t care about your shitty diagnosis. I don’t know who you’ve been around but this is me we’re talking about. I’m an extra crazy dude mostly all the time, but i’m not stupid, neither am I overweight because of sugar.

        How I maintain my level of health with the amount of sugar I consume is also very crazy, so being crazy is very fun :D. It’s all because I mind my own fucking business; the normal thing to do is not to mind your own damn business, and that seemingly contributes to weight gain, that’s why it’s so part of the norm, I would think.

        There is no correlation between the reduction in soft-drinks and weight loss, this is just terrible information, I wouldn’t even call this “science” it’s just foolishness that gets released by clowns. Reduction in the sugar in soft drinks or the reduction in the overall consumption of soft drinks, does not have a significant impact on weight issues one way or the other. At this point, any so called “expert” telling you that “sugar” is the cause of obesity, is just a fucking ignorant fool, it is a well established reality that if you do not control the amount of food you eat, and if you do not go on a balanced diet, you will continue to gain weight reguarless of if what you’re eating contains sugar or not, I do not give a fuck if your doctor is telling you that it is the sugar in your food that is making you fat, or that once you cut out sugar from your drink, or food, you will be alright — this is very false, you cannot lose weight by just removing the element of sugar from your diet, I’m not going to try to get into your fucking head and make a damn diagnosis as to your mental state, because the bottom line is, reguardless, practicing balance is what you have to do to lose weight and it will only happen depending on how much you want it to happen, and how soon you make an effort to make it happen. Excuses are not going to work, because to lose weight and to get healthy, it’s a lifestyle thing; it’s not just a matter of “the sugar” in your diet, this is just stupid and if this is the kind of thing being told to you by individuals who are supposed to be “health experts”, then these health experts should resign and find another job because they are incompetent as fuck and advising very bad information that is dangerous. Bad information such as “sugar is the cause of obesity” is just as equally bad for your health as a terrible physical diet — the real key to weight loss is moderation, not just a foolish matter of removing the substance called “sugar” from your food.

        Neither is the “soft drink” issue a sensible one because reducing your intake of soft drinks is also not going to have a serious impact on obesity, drinking soft drinks only becomes an issue if that is all you drink, not because of the fact that the sugar in the soft drink will make you fat, because it is established that this claim is a load of flimsy garbage, but because more due to the fact that your body needs water, once you deprive your body of water, it’s going to be a problem not because the fucking sugar in the soft drink is going to make you “fat, but because you need fresh water to circulate within your body to wash it out, aid the blood cells and for effective hydration. “Soft drinks” can hydrate you pretty good temporarily in situations where you cannot find any water, but there is no substitute or substrate for water, especially since water does not negatively affect your blood pressure. The matter of drinking soft drinks and most other kinds of drinks are only relevant in the area of blood sugar and blood pressure and proper hydration — the “sugar” in the drink has nothing to do with weight gain or obesity, anybody that tells you differently is just a stupid bitch — make a wise choice do not listen to stupid people giving you stupid information.

        Adding exercise to the mix can help but you need to get your diet in order, because I don’t care how much exercising you do, since, when you exercise, you’re going to get hungry after a while, and when you get hungry and you go back eating the same food that is impacting your weight negatively, it will make your exercising useless as fuck because you didn’t adjust your eating habits. So you’ll just be putting pointless strain on your body at the most, and making yourself feel tired, because the exercises are not going to work because you’re not eating your food in moderation and you are not eating balanced meals; the aim of the exercises should be to aid and be complementary to a healthy diet and an overall healthy lifestyle — you have to work towards these goals, that’s the bottom line, everything else is just an excuse, these are just the things you have to do if you want to lose weight AND maintain great health.

        I have no reason to come on here and just talk a load of bullshit “just cause”; I’m not just talking with no reasoning, at the end of the day, i’m not the one getting fat or obese, I have no reason to lie, I can eat whatever I want, I can drink how many soft drinks I want (and have done exactly as described MANY times over a long consistent number of years), and my weight will remain the same now as it was 10 years ago.

        I’m healthy as fuck, the clothes I owned 21 years ago still fits me almost the same exact way in 2019 as they did all of these many years ago, so i’m definitely not being affected by these foods like some of these studies claim. I’m NOT looking into this issue because i’m some sort of health guru or think i’m some health specialist, as I said before i’m like shark in the water when I detect a shitty cesspool of misinformation, and i’m giving you all wisdom based on motherfucking experience, i’m not just repeating shitty studies I saw online that some of these misleading foolish jackasses put up just to make money and for shock-value without actually presenting anything that has real value. I can detect bullshit and moronic incompetence and this shit about sugar causing weight gain is false and incorrect (atlest in my case), and this is basically why I cover this issue, it’s because i’m interested in the FACTS, and I give you the facts based on years and years of personal first-hand experience with foods containing high levels of sugar that I consume on a daily basis in real life, not some irrelevant lab test done on mice, and as far as I can tell, sugar does not cause anyone to gain weight, it is how much overall calories you are eating that is the root source of causing weight gain, all you have to do is cut down on how much you’re eating substantially, and the weight over time, will also come down substantially. This has been proven by individuals who had weight issues and have tried this method of losing weight, and it has been demonstrated to work if they commit to it, which many of them did which is why they lost weight.

        It is not as hard as it may seem, you just need to stick to it — avoid cutting out entire food groups; the key is portion sizes and how often you eat, BUT losing the weight can be made substantially more effective if done by eating proper vegetable and fruit diets and actually sticking to that adjustment. The number one problem as far as I am concerned is that people don’t stick to these changes in eating habits, and this is important to note because the power is in your hands, you just need to commit to it — cook your foods and find ways to make your meals tasty — a vegetable dish can be just as enjoyable as fast-foods, you just need to learn of ways to achieve such results. One thing I would mention while we are on the subject, is that you should try to avoid eating certain vegetables “raw” — cook your food well, flavor it up, you know add your own style to it, and start from there.

        Another thing you have to be cautious about is this boneheaded encouragement to eat fat — it is retarded to recommend to individuals who are already way too fat and who already have way too much fat, to consume fat, fat is actually not nutritional, if it was, then being fat wouldn’t be so much of a big fat problem these days, so this thing about fat — ignore it completely. You probably don’t have to worry about fat when you’re trying to lose fat because you already have too much of it; just focus on eating a balanced diet in moderation, stop worrying about silly people telling you dumb things.

        If fat was “nutritional” it would be prevalent in a lot of natural foods, like the same damn unprocessed foods that you’re often urged to eat such as fruits and vegetables; as it turns out, fruits and vegetables have way more sugar content than fucking fat, if fat is so vital and nourishing, it would not be so scarcely present in these natural sources of foods. People scarcely have problems retaining alot of fat, which is why there are so many people who are classified as “fat”, you’re not going to help yourself by cluttering up your insides with irrelevant crap, I mean, even fruits have more sugar than fat — that’s saying alot.

        The “sweetness” of foods and the “sugar” content is totally irrelevant, once you over-consume on anything that is well beyond your zone of tolerance, you will run into issues regardless of if you are attracted to the taste or not. What you love to eat can taste like anything, that doesn’t matter, even eating too much of one type of fruit or vegetables or only eating certain types of fruits and vegetables but neglecting a whole host of others can result in different kinds of issues especially if you’re not supplementing well — again moderation is the key, not just what you are eating, it is how you are doing what you are doing that needs to be taken into account also. This thing about “sugar” being the cause of weight gain is foolishness. There is no perfect diet for everyone, you don’t need to watch what someone else is doing just to make a statement about what you saw in some article, what you need to put more effort and time into is getting more practical and work on your own self to figure out what works in your case since just because something is bad for you, it doesn’t mean it’s bad for someone else, so being a food-cop should not be your priority.

        As far as “dieting” goes; only go on a diet that’s reasonable which would be those that help you deal with certain types of real problematic conditions such as weight gain, or things like diabetes, cancer etc, beyond that I don’t care about no “diet” so don’t ask me about it because I don’t know what the fuck you’re doing, it is probably pointless as fuck xD. I don’t care about chauvinistic-diets.

        Once again too, this thing about sugar not “being nutritional” is not really valuable information, it’s known for a long time that sugar is not only “not nutritional” but it’s also “not unhealthy” — in most cases it’s a very neutral substance, only problematic when taken in excessive amounts just like everything else.

        Alot of these studies seem to be done by stupid idiots who seem to have alot of book training but do not seem to have a healthy level of comprehension. It’s common knowledge that sugar doesn’t have nutritional value, sugar doesn’t need to be nutritional because this is not quite the sole purpose that it was created for. It matters not who thinks it’s “necessary, or not necessary” it is just something that people like in some things, and like it or not, that is just how it is. So these fools mentioning that sugar is not “necessary” or that it has no “nutritional value”, are mentioning things that are as old as their fucking granny — this is not breaking news folks. People get the “nutrition” from the real wholesome foods they eat — DUH dum-dums. It’s almost as if these fools are trying desperately to brainwash people with this misleading crap, but once you’re dealing with facts, you don’t need to brainwash or mislead. Some people will just make wise choices and others will just choose to fuck themselves up and make excuses until the damage is permanent.

        Also note that a “snack” is a creatively tailored food, it is not a “natural” product — you can be “snacking” on something that is natural, but most actual “snacks” are not “natural”, and are creatively made to be “treats” and satisfies your urge to explore the delightful tantalizing or savory combinational aspects of a particular delight and are typically on the “lite” side of the spectrum; they are certainly not meant to take the place of real wholesome nutritional meals or natural foods; alot of people like myself know this much.

        Like

      13. [When I say “UFO” is this session, it’s not referring to the standard use of the term “UFO”; i’m actually sarcastically referring to Conspiracy Theory version of the term UFO where some people use the term “UFO” to mean aliens flying around in aircrafts despite the FACT that 99-percent of these UFOs do not look like “aircrafts” by definition, and are also spotted IN earth which makes the likelihood of them being actual “aliens”, in the true sense of the word, as opposed to something or things that have a connection with earth, highly false.

        I do believe in UFOs in the standard original sense of the term that there could be a number of unidentified-flying-objects and unidentified-aerial-objects seen from time to time that cannot be easily explained, but I do not see the situation of “UFOs” from the Conspiracy Theorist assumption that every UFO is a fucking “alien” aircraft. And as a matter of fact, as it turns out, alot of the real authentic unexplained “UFO” instances that i have seen, rarely take the form of anything even remotely resembling any kind of actual technological spacecraft, certainly not resembling anything you see in Star Trek and stuff, which is usually where people get most of their ideas for “alien” B.S from]

        I’m not someone you can just put in a box, I shit on unrealistic people’s preconceived expectations all-the-time; I’m a master at doing this, I DEFLECT back [alot] with times the force for the stiff-necked fucks, because I say what I actually think, I don’t need a clutch or to hang on to a common perception to have a voice, i’m not follow-pattern and don’t need to hop on to a common-consensus to feel like somebody, the consensus is only relevant to me if it’s apart of the fucking FACTS. I have a voice and I have some views and I let it be known, it’s easy as 1-2-3!.

        Now some people have different passions; one of MY passions is to deliver truth and facts; that doesn’t mean that I don’t talk about certain things, but that’s where the difference is; some people love to talk about bullshit, but that’s the thing, i’m not going to just accept something because it’s a “different opinion” — I love to talk about what makes their bullshit, utter bullhsit.

        So sure I would talk about things like “aliens” and “E.T” and “UFOs”, but I wouldn’t like to talk about “alien abductions” and this kind of nonsense; I would love to talk about why it’s bullshit, how I think it’s bullshit and what makes it bullshit. So people are passionate about such topics, no doubt, but people are passionate about it for different reasons, so I would talk about certain things as I truly believe them to be, just as how certain people talk about stuff as they truly believe them to be; it’s just that I really have an opinion that is really not going to be the stereotypical, and I really like to tell you what I think about it, and even be more outspoken of the reality that what I think, may be actually RELEVANT in terms of realistic comprehensive validity.

        So no, you won’t catch me believing in aliens and “motherships” because there [to my mind] is no aliens and motherships. Some people believe in aliens and motherships but I believe in eternal life and GOD, and knowledge, being the real key to move society forward in many aspects of life — realistically.

        I definitely believe in the supernatural; it’s a fact that, by definition, we are surrounded by lots of supernatural causes and events that make life what it is, and I think understanding these dynamics is the real key to developing a meaningful future, and I don’t think it is going to be the baseless “acknowledgment” of some random aliens far out in the galaxy with “advanced technology”. I think it’s more misguided to believe in some alien that is 4 billion light-years away, than to believe in a creator atleast, and if I believe in a creator, especially one that is the creator of life on earth, then obviously said creator cannot truly be an “alien” by definition anyhow.

        The term UFO means nothing; anything could be a “UFO”, there are some people that call some of the most obvious things that are actually really “explainable”; “UFOs”. “UFO” is a term that really means nothing unless you have a real valid case of substance to back it up, especially the use of the term “alien”, especially in the event when you’re seeing something that’s not actually “extraterrestrial” but is actually spotted on earth.

        It is a flipping fact that 99% of all supposed “alien” and UFO encounters actually happen on the earth itself, with nothing that shows these so-called “aliens” and “UFOs” actually arriving from out of space into the earth, or from another planet, and there is a good reason for that and it’s because plenty of people just throw these terms around,and when you keep seeing the same farce over a period of time you begin to understand the gimmick and the trickery quite well to where you can discern the authentic from the garbage no matter where or who it is coming from.

        Generally, some scientist also miserably fail to find any “aliens” on some of our closest planets, yet along to explain why would you have to go a thousand +1 light-years out into a distant galaxy, to “find” life, and why would the prospects of life be “more” possible all the way “out there”, than much nearer; it actually just makes the case for “aliens” more unconvincing. I do not buy this logic of “it’s because space is big”; I think the reality is that the truth is alot closer to home than many might think, in-all-likelihood which may turn out to be the most baffling part about this whole situation.

        Often time I think “the truth” IS alot CLOSER to home — I actually believe in unexplained-supernatural-phenomenons than I do in futuristic-technologically-advanced-aliens. This thing about aliens and things of that type just looks to be a totally delusional misguided misperception, based on some debunked bull about mars having martians; you don’t even need to be a rocket scientist to notice, that in our part of the “spacial” spectrum, that you’re not seeing much activity out there in space in-terms of aliens flying around and stuff, which is the reality here that is actually very strange when you consider how there has been more than enough time for more than enough planets with life, just like earth, to have developed by now.

        Humans are on earth and “life” [as we know it] has not ever managed to develop even in any of the CLOSEST planets within our own neighborhood, but somehow in the minds of some, life is expected to exist far far far away, because space is big and we just conveniently don’t have the “advanced technology” to reach “them” — this is complete sci-fi crap, that I really actually do like to talk about, not to promote and perpetuate such unlikely “dreams” [if you will], but to expose just how amusingly unconvincing it truly is LMAO. So just because you don’t support a notion, it doesn’t mean that you can’t have LOTS of FUN with it :D.

        I get a kick out of talking about “UFOs” and “aliens”, not because I believe in them but because it’s alot of fun just exposing how foolish as fuck some of these things really sound like. So just because I don’t believe in them, doesn’t mean I don’t like talking about them; it’s just that some people like bringing these issues up for different reasons. Some people really believe in them, and I on-the-other-hand, likes to say why I think the whole thing is fucking nonsense, so I do like to talk about them per-say, but I like to talk about them within a different perspective :D.

        I don’t have to reinforce how low the possibility of meeting aliens is, because of the fact that we just don’t see any physical traces of these commonly held perceptions of these “humanoids” foreign entities; only people who still believe in “martians on mars” believe in this silliness. I think we have a much greater chance of meeting GOD then we do some fucking alien. Don’t ask me how I know because I’ll just tell you that it’s because we are here ALREADY, so GOD has obviously been here already — he was already here once; he can just a MIRACULOUSLY do it again once more. GOD = 1, Aliens “with advanced technology from another galaxy” = 0 :D. I don’t know man, I think when you actually breakdown this “alien” stuff with just basic reality, it’s actually backward logic that just “alienates” the truth and turns reality into science-fiction.

        Don’t be fooled, some people talk about they’re not into “religion” and Christianity and things like this, but often many of these people have alternative clutches; they believe in “UFOs” and the “paranormal”, or they’re heavily into “nationality” etc, often times you find alot of kinks in the armor when you take note of their actions despite the incoherent and inconsistent contradictory chatter.

        Like

      14. I always look to bring things back to reality, which surely means getting back to basics and down to the fucking essence, so it should come as no shock that there are certain things that I don’t entertain because they just reap unequivocal garbage, PRACTICALLY speaking. When dealing with critical matters, if what you’re mustering up is completely dysfunctional on a practical level, then it is just fucking hogwash.

        I’m a person of ideas and vision; I’m more in sync with inspirational visions than “philosophy”; I do not do no damn “philosophy”. I am fond of helping people to see things much better wherever I can — I put things in context, bring it back to the basics and help them see things very clearly, and extend to them realistic perspectives so that they can avoid unrealistic expectations as much as possible, with a touch of explicit fucking craziness. My STANDARDS is to help people to REALIZE not “philosophize” — helping people to see and to understand what the fuck is actually going on.

        Some clueless sets spend alot of time philosophizing and these kinds of stifling delusions, rather than understanding and REALIZING what the fuck is actually going on. So I don’t have time for philosophy; if anything I’m a visionary, not a “philosopher”. Don’t expect me to tell you that the earth is flat and a triangle is Illuminati and corny bum shit like that — NOPE I’m crazy as fuck to tell you straight up what is fucking facts because I’m infatuated with correct facts and captivated with factsโœ”๏ธ, factsโœ”๏ธ FACTSโœ”๏ธ FACTSโœ”๏ธ FACTSโœ”๏ธ.

        I mean sure if you have a job where you just sit around and talk a lot of bullshit, like you’re part of the media and you spread fake news, and you just sit and run your shithole day-in-and-day-out and you can make-up narratives and fool yourself that you’re fooling everyone, and don’t really have to produce real results or you’re not doing anything that depends on providing real, real substance and real solutions, and your crappy livelihood revolves around being unsophisticated and unconstructive — SURE you can take your useless shitty degrees and useless thoughts and philosophize all-day every day, unless people target your sponsors and take away your income and then you eventually need to find a real productive job instead of regurgitating silly fake news and degenerate fallacy.

        But if you’re dealing with things of a practical nature that are critical and vital, you don’t have no time for no damn philosophy, you already have too much real stuff to analyze and research and actually figure out, as opposed to finding different ways to twist a distort and dilute, and intensively DELUDE yourself while bore the fuck out of others. I’m not “sponsored”, i’m just energetic — I do this out of share will and charisma! :D. No “philosophy”, over here, it leads to alot of misguided false perceptions about reality, often time. I’m like a fucking eye-surgeon; I deliver eye-opening KRAP that cleans up psychological perceptible cataract, because with the excessive stupidity adrift, you might become “shocked”, and we can’t have that ๐Ÿ‘Žโœ–๏ธ — it’s no shock that slowness and sloppiness leads to “shock”; we don’t need to be “shocked” and stuck in dumb mode, we need to be well ENERGIZED and fully charismatic โœ”๏ธโœ–๏ธ๐Ÿ‰

        Like

      15. You hear alot that “sugar in fruit is not bad”, but I don’t know if these people are just playing games or just not paying attention, because that is the whole point, sugar is not bad PERIOD irrespective of if it’s in fruit or some other source, because the facts are that “sugar” comes from natural crops to begin with, so obviously if sugar is in fruit and it doesn’t do anything, then how the fuck do these people think it makes sense that because the same sugar that comes from fruit is placed in other things, that it all-of-a-sudden becomes bad?, this is just a feeble attempt to get people to stop eating other kinds of foods.

        Sugar in fruit has the same kind of affect in people with certain medical conditions, and its solely because of the sugar in the fruit; diabetics and so-on have to watch their intake of fruits because of this exact reason, so there is no real difference between the sugar in fruit, and the sugar you buy packaged, since, they all come from natural sources. That’s why I tell people don’t bother with the inaccurate studies, be more practical and instead go on a diet without sugar in it, but eat the same exact foods, and they will discover that the result will be the same because sugar is not the case of obesity. If you eat the same exact foods that you’ve been eating without sugar in them, you will still get fat, the only key to weight gain is moderation and watching your overall day-to-day intake of certain foods.

        Now there are some people that might not want to hear it because they don’t like to accept responsibility, but moderation is the key. There is going to be some people that might not take “moderation” seriously but that’s only because they already over-did-it to the point where moderation isn’t even a fucking viable option anymore, they have to cut it out altogether, but it’s only their fault for letting get to that point, so they wouldn’t really understand this basic principle and think that the key is to eliminate entire food groups from the diet, but it doesn’t change the FACT that you can prevent alot of these issues by not abusing or overusing the privilege.

        Now moderation actually varies from person to person — just because I can probably take six cans of coke or something like that and be good as fuck, and someone else does the same exact thing and they swell up and get fat, it doesn’t mean 6 cans of coke is “excessive”, maybe for that other person it was, but for me it clearly wasn’t and had no effect, so moderation doesn’t mean doing what someone else does, it means knowing what the fuck you can handle and taking care of your side of things according to your own needs and challenges, that’s what the fuck “moderation” is, and means. Just looking at the “numbers” side of the issue and not the logical side of the issue, people might think that the 6-cans was “too much”, but it’s not too much, they’re just in denial of their own fucking flaws, they think the fault is with everything else, but obesity and weight gain is a genetic issue, it’s biological; there is no damn food with some sort of “evil chemical” that makes people fat — this is a myth.

        Another “fun”-fucking-fact I will tell you about, is how many individuals have been known to still gain weight off of certain vegetables and the excuse is because of the “carbohydrates” in the vegetables. If you are telling me that there are humans that can get weight gain off of “carbohydrates” from basic fucking vegetables, not even from processed food, but we are talking about “carbohydrates” from basic natural produce like: “rice”, “potatoes” and “corn”; what the fuck is out there that wouldn’t make them fat?, how in the possible fuck are they not going to gain some kind of weight, unless they really start carefully “dieting”?. Vegetables are as natural as you can get, and they are saying that these individuals are still getting fat because of the “carbohydrates breaking down into sugar”?, and i’m supposed to just foolishly believe that the issue is just a mere fact of “processed foods”, when they can gain just as much weight from “carbohydrates” in “starchy” vegetables? — HAAAAA-HAAAAAAAA-HAAAAA-HAAAA!!!

        Individuals like to talk alot about how there is sugar in everything but that again is another bullshit excuse (it is true that sugar is in many things, but this is often just used as an excuse many times) because sugar may be in alot of things but it’s often found in many things that they DO NOT need, and in stuff that is traditionally actually expected to contain a reasonable amount of sugar according to what it is that’s being made, so once again, the problem is not the sugar and actually comes back down to what are they doing with stuff that actually has sugar in it, are they slow?; how about some fruits and vegetables?. And I’m sure that in a huge majority of these cases, if folks actually took them in MODERATION, then these things that they claim to have sugar in them, would not be a problem.

        Like

      16. Let me just add to the session I did yesterday and reiterate that people are not addicted to sugar, they like the overall flavor of certain types of foods, not just the sugar because if half the things they ate just had sugar in them and did not taste very well, they will not eat it, they will not give a fuck about the sugar inside of it, so this thing about people being addicted to sugar and only sugar, is not real. They are not addicted to sugar, they just really enjoy the flavor of many foods that also have many kinds of other ingredients.

        Anybody that claims to be addicted to sugar but cannot actually stand plain “sugar”, the same sugar they claim to be “addicted” too, is a complete clown. Now there are plenty of complete nincompoops, so do not be shocked that there will be alot of fools who will make up alot of excuses and silly claims in this area to try to convince you that the reason why many people like so much of these foods, is because they are addicted to “sugar”, there are just some folks that love attention and they always have to be the victim at the mercy of something.

        Saying that they are “addicted to sugar” or that they “cut out sugar”, is just a lazy way of referring to what is actually a long list of different foods that they once ate, that factually contained way more than just “sugar” which is why they liked those foods so much. There is not one food out there that only has “sugar” in it, the only way to just have sugar is to eat plain “sugar” and “sugar” only; every other kind of food is a combination of sugar mixed with other things, so they are clearly not just addicted to the “sugar”; put a plate of sugar infront of them and I guarantee you that they will not enjoy it very much, they might pretend too in some cases, because they have to prop up their “addiction” claims, but they won’t be fooling anyone. Many of these people like these foods because of the flavor, texture and taste of the food, not only and not solely because the food has fucking sugar.

        You might ask me “if sugar is not addictive, why do [some] people who cut out sugar out of their diet, feel the need to go back to those foods?”; the answer to that is what I have already said in my previous sessions, which is essentially that whenever they say that they are “cutting out sugar”, it is actually a very broad list of foods that they are eliminating, and they basically are left with not that many options after that but to settle for things that, for them personally, are not as appealing or impressive flavor-wise, and in comparison are just subpar.

        So because it is alot of different types of foods they eliminated with all different styles, shapes etc, they begin to miss the overall flavors of those individual foods and how well they actually tasted, because they decided to stop eating them because the foods have sugar in them, which is a very unwise move because if the makers of those foods and the manufacturers of those foods take sugar out of those foods, these same individuals are going to be able to eat those foods again and then they will realize that they will start to gain weight again because they were trying to avoid sugar thinking sugar is what makes them fat, not knowing that as long as you consume a certain amount of calories, it will trigger weight gain regardless of sugar being present in the food that you are eating or not.

        That reality seems to be why there are these claims of “hidden sugar” in things these days because they can’t figure out why they are still getting fat on something that is said to have no sugar, and it’s because they were believing in this falsehood that sugar was the cause of them gaining weight, and thought that they could eat just as much of something if it didn’t contain sugar, and are realizing the hard reality that sugar never truthfully had anything to do with weight gain, and that once you continue with the same eating habits, you will gain weight regardless of if what you are eating, has sugar or not.

        However, even if there are people who insist that they are addicted to sugar, that is their personal issue, addiction is a personality issue — a substance doesn’t “make” people “addicted”, people can only “get” addicted, and do only “get” addicted to substances.

        Sure you might find sugar in many things but that’s just taking a page out of life’s playbook, I mean as it turns out, alot of things just workout really well with sugar or a sweet aspect — you can combine sugar and many other herbs and spices with many things to create lots of other appetizing foods, just like how in life, most fruits have a sweet aspect mixed with various other aspects.

        As it stands, the case for this “addiction” thing looks really weak — ask anyone to give up or eliminate things and activities they really enjoy because they have a medical condition, and it would be difficult, it doesn’t matter what it is, it doesn’t matter if we are talking about food or sports or a particular hobby, people will find it difficult to stop things they enjoy and this could be in the form of many things. So there is no true “addiction” involved when it comes to the case of sugar; they are obviously not addicted to sugar, they just find it difficult to stop eating things that were delicious and fun to eat, in favor of things that do not seem to be as interesting in comparison which is a very predictable reaction. I doubt that if you just gave them just raw sugar, they would pay it any mind, and the folks doing some of these “studies” are just silly and lack basic sense plus they use alot of lousy and poorly researched junk science.

        Also everything about these claims seem to actually point to just a poor choice of words often unintentionally, but sometimes which seems to be intentional coming from some sources because they are trying to frame a picture and forge the case of “addiction”, plus they found a couple of stooge “scientist” to go along with the retardation so that they can say “look people really have an ‘addiction’ to sugar; believe us we found a couple of SCIENTISTS that did ‘scientific experiments’ to come to this conclusion”, but it’s not so much of a plausable case for a scientic discovery as much as it is a poor description, since other appropriate descritions could have been used like “enfactuated” with sugar or how they have a “passion” for sugar, but they chose “addiction” to create an artifical illusion that there trully is an addiction to sugar, when all of the facts point to the reality that alot of people are not actually addicted to “sugar” they just enjoy the overall flavor of different tyes of food, and would not pay any mind to a scoop of sugar if it was just sugar alone that was available, which does not make any sense because they claim to have an “addiction” to sugar, which is clearly then a meaningless vague exaggeration, and also a misleading claim.

        Like

      17. I thought about some things recently concerning the exaggerations and flat out lies about sugar and weight gain, and something else came to mind, where, clueless clowns mention that people get a sugar “rush” from eating sweet things, and they try to go into the “science” of it, which states that after folks eat the things with sugar, they would temporarily feel better, and that is effectively what these clowns try to say is what makes these things “addicting”, since it apparently pleases individuals and makes them desire more. This is what they call “addiction” because they claim it triggers something in the brain that has a “pleasurable” effect on the user and makes the users enticed to go back for more.

        But when you think about it, they are describing the same exact effects which commonly happens with a variety of many other foods, that satisfies the cravings of individuals. The stupid thing about it is, anyone would have the same kind of reaction to virtually ANYTHING they consume that satisfies their cravings, whether it has “sugar” or not.

        So basically all they are doing is describing the event or instance of something being “satisfactory” as an “addiction” which is extremely incompetent, Now if these are the kinds of folks doing these so-called “studies” with that level of thinking and reasoning, it is no wonder that they fail to curb obesity, it’s because they have no basic sense, this kind of nonsense is feeble as fuck.

        This is why the “science” behind “addiction” as a whole is bullshit because “addition” is a compulsive reaction, it’s not an actual disorder; it only becomes an “addiction” when some of these people are “addicted” to something that causes them harm. If they had been “addicted” to something that did not cause them harm or affect them in the same negative way, the “addiction” would not even be considered.

        Just as how the effects of food vary from person to person, so does this thing known as “addiction”. Some people are just bizarre in this regard and get “addicted” to alot of things, but that is tied to their personality, it is an “individual” thing, it does not make what they claim to be addicted to, something that is the fault for their addiction any more than someone causing harm to their own selves by not taking responsibility and changing their lifestyle to suit their own needs or inadequacies. Being addicted to certain things is like a fucking alcoholic being “addicted” to alcohol, it’s just a matter something about them that makes them addicted, that does not mean that alcohol makes people addicted to alcohol — nothing “makes” people addicted, people “get” addicted. In most of these cases, it is the people who are the problem to their own selves, not the things that they are using since many of these things are not inherently or naturally poisonous or toxic; these (addiction, etc) are just flimsy excuses.

        So these fools, pushing this folly about sugar being the cause of weight gain, who seem to be easily fooled, are suggesting that just because they have found and discovered a select set of people who are addicted to sugar, it means that EVERYONE is “addicted” to sugar. That’s like saying just because there are those who are addicted to crack or cocaine, it means that everyone will be addicted to crack and cocaine and weed smoking. That logic is flawed, you can always find a group of people who can be addicted to almost anything, or who can claim to be “addicted” to anything, this is not to say that the things they are going for are actually the fault of their addiction — something bizarre is just wrong with them individually on a case-by-case basis, not the substances they are choosing freely to abuse.

        People being pleased with things that “satisfy” their cravings, is in no way an “addiction”; an addiction is actually a personality issue. Most times, people who say that they are “addicted” to sugar is misleading, they are not addicted to sugar, they just like alot of things that taste good, which happen to have sugar in them. If they were truly addicted to sugar, then a bowl of plain sugar grains would be the only thing they would have. So they are not addicted to sugar, they just can’t get enough of the FLAVORS of certain types of foods.

        People just naturally like food, so just because someone eats something, then goes back later and eats it again because they like it; this does not constitute as “addiction”. It’s pretty retarded to classify a natural reaction to hunger, and the repeated process of satisfying that hunger, as an “addiction”, regardless of what the person is “preferring” to eat. People could even become “addicted” to vegetables since there are those who may feel that they like vegetables and can’t see themselves not eating vegetables; can’t this be also described as an “addiction” to vegetables?. “Addiction” is a personality issue, it’s retarded to take someone’s personality issue and apply their “addictive” personality issue to every man, woman, and child.

        Sugar can be counted as a “calorie” but it is not a “bad calorie” which is why it can be found in many natural types of fruits and crops, it is more in nature to something like a spice, just like salt (or curry or cinnamon), and even salt can cause issues in some people which I have also mentioned in previous sessions. Again there is no real proof that sugar is the case of obesity — you will not lose weight by just removing sugar from foods; if someone claims to lose weight because they “cut sugar out of their diet”, it’s usually because they stopped eating a wide list of foods, which [in the process] passively restricted their ability to over-eat a high amount of overall calories, and it is not because they just didn’t eat something that had sugar in it.

        Additionally, don’t be phased by this foolishness about “there is no nutritional value in soft drinks”; most people never thought that these things were “nutritional”; people don’t drink these things because they are “nutritional”, usually they drink these things to either hydrate themselves and cool themselves off temporarily, or to have something to “wash down” what they are eating. The bottom line is these “studies” are just wrong about sugar being the cause of obesity.

        The same thing with things like cakes and so on, nobody ever expects these things to be perfect nutritional sources, this is not actually breaking news. These treats are typically used to satisfy cravings temporarily, but no one ever uses these things for “nutritional value” — the bottom line is these “studies” are just wrong about sugar being the cause of obesity.

        Many people like myself we indulge in many of these sweet treats, but they are never used as our main source of daily nutrients. Sugar is not an “addition” to me; I can “quit” sugar, but i’m not stupid so i’m just not going to do this for the fact that it is unnecessary, and i’m certainly not going to do such a thing just because a jackass is lying about it, since the bottom line is, these “studies” are just wrong about sugar being the cause of obesity.

        Like

      18. Chatter comes up sometimes about “the world is watching”, but I don’t give 1 singular fuck who is watching, I love this. They better be watching; I might fuck the shit out of their mothers when they are not looking. So please watch so I can stay “educational” — rat fucks might learn something. I have a radical approach but don’t take me for a fool. As the saying goes, I’m crazy but i’m not stupid.

        One of the crazy views I’m bringing up today is what appears to be the surprising similarities between the circumstantial situations of the andamanese tribe and the contrast of the ancient population of jews or jewish descendants that are said to be in africa (in ethiopia), who themselves seem to have just been placed there out of nowhere; I also found it to be very surprising how the andamanese, sentinelese, and jarawa tribes, seem to have the same element of circumstantial surprise, where, they just seem to have been stuck into an indian territory for about 50,000 – 55,000 years with no clear explanation or trace as to how they ended up in their situation. It makes me laugh my azz off because these tribes are bonafide culturally ancient people even having what appears to be their own form of spoken language, that does not seem to have a trace of written form anywhere.

        Now if you know anything about languages, you know that it’s not just something that one person can develop within a century or two, these folks are definitely living a culture that’s indigenous and have been doing so for thousands of years, even before a particular time period that certain other cultures who are said to be the “cradle of civilizations” actually started; even as far back around when the great sphinx was said to be affected by water erosion and the ancient egytians were on earth. This is very significant and it also puts into question the timing of the great flood, because if this flooding supposedly happened about 36,000 years ago that caused erosion to the sphinx, then how was this settlement not affected since they have allegedly been on those islands for over 50,000 years? [unless that flood in particular was not as catastrophic and only was specific to that region]

        In case you’re wondering where I got the 50,000 – 55,000 years old figure from, it’s an estimation that came up based on original trace D.N.A hair samples that were said to have dated to these time frames, from remains of inhabitants who were said to be related to the current inhabitants a.k.a the local Jarwa and adamanese individuals (and other tribes in that area) who live there now. So originally, human remains on the island are said to point to evidence that these settlements have been on those islands for approximately over a 50,000 – 55,000 years old span; so this is the context for aging that I’m citing. You should be able to find some information about it upon further research. They seem to be in a land that is mostly indian today but it would blow my mind if it were the other way around in that, they were actually there first and then the indians came and began to flourish, because it’s absolutely perplexing IF these tribes were there even before anybody else this whole time, even to where india became a developed country, and nobody really knew about these tribes that have been there for over 50,000 – 55,000 years LOL.

        An important factor in all of this observation is also the fact that they are of a very ancient lineage, who clearly have a language, but no known form of a written version of their language is known to exist, which just shows that just because they do not have a written form of language even after being around for 50,000 – 55,000 years (a very very long time), it does not mean that they were incapable of speech. I highlighted this reality because this could also be the case with the ancient prehistoric extinct humans that once existed too, (who we are also said to have “evolved” from, but who I believe were perhaps another group of diverse humans, who we infact did not “evolve” and “mutate” from, or they were just animals who are being theoretically linked to actual humans just for the sake of giving credence to baseless notions of “evolution” ) who did not appear to have any form of a writing system, and it is then often assumed that because they did not leave behind any writing, it was possible that it was because they could not really speak or communicate like modern humans, but we can tell by the case of these indigenous people, who have been around for approximately 50,000 – 55,000 years and still have no known form of writing, that there is a very real possibility that prehistoric humans could have been able to communicate excellently among themselves, even though they did not develop an elaborate written language system.

        I mean alot of these people live really close together and they have the ability to interact very well, so it would make sense that the urgency or need to develop some kind of writing just isn’t there, plus the fact that they are typically too pre-occupied with other immediate day-to-day cultural activities. What’s more is that the “shrinking” of the population of these tribes and the subsequent total perish that typically follows, builds a strong case as to what may have [totally or partly] also caused the demise of other groups of extinct humans.

        But it captivates me how there is some similarity (on the surface) of their situation, and that of the ancient jewish population randomly situated in ethiopia. That’s just some extra things about the situation that I wanted to pull up and shed some light on because i’m surprised and captivated about this particular case and the parallels.

        Like

      19. I’m going to proceed and tell you something about so-called “word games”, shitheads love to play word games and usually shitheads expose their own insecurities by playing their own word games — this is the mark of individuals who are rotten on the inside which is why when you see some of these filthy rats coming around with these kinds of crappy priorities, you shut them down early because these retards don’t own the english vocabulary.

        They are contradictory is their kind of logic to begin with, since some of these people would mention their view of people using certain words frequently and too miss-applied; but at the same time these stupid clowns would themselves repeat words like “amazing” for example, or “genius” for example 1000 times, often without merit or validity and they appear to be well and good with this. So they think it’s perfectly fine to use words non-stop because they want to use these words and terms they chose, but somehow other words are not to be used as much or in some cases at-all, because it’s without merit so you can’t just throw it around, atleast according to these lames ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ’ฏ.

        It’s the same thing with these overnight “angelic” role-model individuals who say they are not “religious” they are “spiritual”; like I said, some habits that some people have is the mark of utter bullshit, so you shun it down real early because they don’t make no sense — these are just small-minded, rat-like, petty-fools.

        It’s a defective D.N.A trait perhaps, how else would you explain it?, there is no logical reason, unless somehow you have managed to unintentionally but effectively fluster these sensitive cream-pies, potentially nosy fuckers who probably have their mind on you but you often have better things to do with your brilliant time than to waste on these freaks. Word game are not good games; in reality, it’s about realistically playing your cards right. They talk how they talk, and you will just talk how you talk. Realistic wisdom for the realistic folk โœ”๏ธโœ–๏ธ๐Ÿ‰.

        Like

      20. Humans being “naked” I think is a very important clue as to where our true origins might have been and I think it very well does suggest that the first humans were created for warm/heated climates (even scietists describe humans as “mammals”), so in my opinion anywhere on earth that snows, and has hail storms and things like that, is very unlikely to be where life actually started, now it’s beyond me that a highly intelligent GOD would look to create humans and life before actually making sure that the earth was itself sorted out to a certain degree, now looking at it from this angle, you will also have to take into account everything else outside of earth aswell like the stars and the sun, plus the “anti-gravity” state and nature of the universe itself needing to be ideally positioned or ideal to support such conditions, so what this tells me is that early earth was probably very very different atmospherically and stability wise, because no creator is going to make a group of humans (“naked” at that) and just stick them in a place that is highly volatile, it is counter-productive and counter-intuitive, so I believe that the early earth’s conditions for early humans was that of a warm or even mostly heated environment, and a place that probably has a good amount of vegetation identicle to that of a tropical region, so I honestly must conclude that it’s looking more realistically that Africa or somewhere around that region (especially based on what is found evidence wise thus far) is the real story of humanity and perhaps where human life first sprung from.

        I’m not really going to focus on skin color too much because I love all people: white, Latin/Hispanic, Asian; it doesn’t matter the truth is the truth. Don’t get me wrong, not all people that are “black” are “good”, not all people that are “white” are “good”, not all people that are “Asian” are “good”, not all people that are “Semitic” are “good”; we cannot be blind to this reality, but i’m not here to judge, if you are a conniving toxic shit, you get managed like a son of a bitch, if you show respect you get respect, that’s how it is with me.

        Additionally I think somewhere around the time of the dinosaurs is probably when cataclysms developed and started happening, and these cataclysms might have been what further went on to cause certain chain of events and a chain of conditions to occur, like triggering the on-set of periodic storms and so-on, it is unlikely to me that some of these “seasons” were around when the first humans appeared (or atleast not in certain places), they would have obviously frozen to death or something like that, because lets us not forget that very early humans would not have had the benefit of applying already established solutions and assets to cope with certain conditions like we have the luxary of today especially not in situations that arose from massively catestrophic disasters that just suddenly happened out of nowhere; likewise the same things would have happened to alot of animals around at the time too, but based on reasonable evidence we can conclude that many animal types had lived on earth for millions of years in earth’s early history, and apparently not many of them in very icy or frosty conditions, so it’s looking like a hot kind of wet, lush tropical climate and warm climate with some good vegetation, and so-on, is probably the most likely reasonable scenario.

        Some thing else i’m going to put on the table is the issue of our human brains; there is often speculation concerning why our brains are developed like the way they are compared to other creatures, and what explains this kind of “leap” in intellectual capacity. In my view, everything in the DNA of a life-form is for a purpose, and to my mind it’s clear that our brains helps us to make tools and to function more sophisticated as a society and to help raise our young and so on, but I [also] think the more critical reason for the development in the brains of human beings is so that we can have a very strong relationship with our real creator; to me that seems to be the biggest reason and the most important key to our brains, and it’s that it revolves around the creator, and so that we can have a relationship with the holy spirit, similar to much of the interactions and stuff you’ll hear about in Christianity and read about in the bible etc. Our brain and voice helps us to connect with the creator, this to me is the original reason why our brains are the way that they are, whether we are talking about the humans around I modern times or the prehistoric humans, it’s still all under the same purpose. Reproduction to me in all life-forms is an indication to me that life was meant to be around forever really and truly, but that’s just a side note. Our brains is designed so that we can interact with the almighty before everything else. The first gift the first humans received other than the gift of life itself, was the gift of wisdom. This once again parallels with alot of the documented historical accounts of scenarios in the bible scriptures.

        People are looking around for “alien” life, but life is here on this planet among alot of other planets that were supposedly here for millions and billions of years, and that in of itself is extremely significant, we don’t need no damn aliens in the picture to see this much, fuck this “non-believing” crap, there IS everything we know of that proves this can’t all be a fluke, everything we know of proves that the source of “existence” ALSO has to be the source of life, a power that’s so great and so commanding, that nobody can convince me was circumstances created by individuals who are themselves humbled by these same realities. They don’t deserve the praise that should be reserved for the spirit that made us ALL possible under the same purpose. Even if some folks insist that the sumerian “gods” were part of human history, just think about this, if they could do the things that was alleged that they did in those scenarios, just think about what the real true GOD is like. I don’t give a fuck what they were doing, all praises be to the real GOD, not humanoids.

        Lets get more insightful, see, in some of these ancient stories even their “gods” covered up, Adam and Eve covered up and all subsequent people after the “fact” (and I use “fact” loosely) lived lives with their bodies covered up, and these stories about origins with these people wearing “clothes” was supposedly the start of civilization that actually spread out to modern times, yet we have cultures that even still exist today that were here for approximately over 50 thousand years untouched by modern “civilizations” (modern civilizations who popularized the wearing of clothes) — 50,000 year old civilizations who still live relatively basic lives with the utilization of fundamental principles and values reminiscent of the stone age era, who get sick from even the slightest contact with modern “outsiders”, paralleling other accounts of “modern” people going into certain settlements and also making said settlements sick; settlements and cultures who were also said to have been very ancient cultures that existed long before modern established civilizations, linking up to a time where prehistoric humans also walked the earth, who themselves used the same type of adaptations that some currently existing 50.000 – 55,000 years old cultures who are said to exist far longer than modern civilizations, still use.

        So then how can these people in these 50,000 year old settlements, possibly living in what could only be described as an alternative 50 thousand year old universe, possibly have the same origins as the rest of “modern” societies, when they don’t seem to know of any other way of life for over 50 thousand years?, this seems to be the remanence/remanent of an authentic “untouched” 50,000 – 55,000 year old missing link associated with some of earth’s lost history. These are original traces of our original origins from our original history which shows signs that singularly predate alot of these other ancient cultures that are labeled the “cradle of civilization” — these cultures were cut from a different cloth, they were cut from a different material out of a different page of history, once again putting the credibility of the claims of some researchers into considerable question, following considerable doubt. How do some of these motherfuckers explain the anomalous enigmatic Andamanese and Sentinelese 50,000 – 55,000 thousand years old untouched “tribes”?.

        I also think that through history many things may have lead to the demise of certain ethnic groups such as; conflict, accidental disasters, famine, the failure to adapt (which is one you hear often, but certainly not the only one), diseases, natural disasters, certain beliefs, etc, I don’t think that it all came down to necessarily 1 singular thing, in some cases.

        Like

      21. When it comes to this “earth is flat” notion being echoed by certain groups, half of it is sincere where as half of it isn’t, so half these people can’t OR don’t even want to understand or reason something as basic and as elementary as these everyday natural fundamentals we truly live with that make up the earth’s unique geometer, but ironically want folks to present to them some big elaborate proof that the earth is flat, never mind the fact that you can disprove the “flatness” of earth by using examples of the different terrains and landscapes already on earth, but I digress, they just think you need to waste more time, while failing to absolutely comprehend the proof that’s already out there and before all to witness.

        The best many of them do when they get exposed for being silly (this would be they half who are not sincere because of petty ideological rationale), is to claim an “appeal” to personal ignorance whenever they go “well I haven’t seen it first-hand, so I don’t know”, this B.S is a two-way streak because I haven’t seen anyone burned alive right in front of me, but I have realistic sense to know this is reality and a fact of life that happens, it is the same way I could look at what’s around us to figure things out, like looking at the moon, and the sun and their formations, and reasonably conclude that we are part of such formation and are subject to the same rules and laws that rule nature, because i’m not dealing with philosophy, i’m dealing with real life!, and real circumstances so I use real accurately focused perspective — it not that fucking hard, it’s not advanced geometry or rocket science.

        So this buffoonery about “the earth is flat”, can’t be just raw stupidity, it has to be rooted in something more unreasonable, so to me it’s a “cave-in” to philosophy because philosophy is unstable, in philosophy you don’t have to actually mean what the fuck you say; all manner of true reason, purpose and logic goes out the window. When it comes to “philosophy”, you could just spin and twist and make up any form of bullshit, that’s how philosophy is, it’s not realistic thinking, so no matter how much proof is actually out there, some fucking philosophers are not going to see it for what it actually is.

        Often these shenanigans is just a way for someone to make themselves feel more insightful than they really are being, just like by the same motherfucking token, “philosophy” is just a way to make things seem more convoluted and twisted than they really are. In the case of earth, we don’t need no damn philosophy because we are more than developed in the capabilities and means of access to study its reality, so it’s a waste of realistic time to spend any energy on this nonsense with the amount and abundance of great information and data that’s out there in this era, that is done by real research, and hard labor and long hours and sacrifice, all because some people choose to remain in denial for their own unrealistic philosophies or trivial petty nonsensical motives.

        On another note, lets establish something; “horizontal” is an “orientation”, it has nothing to do with being flat. Flat and horizontal are 2 completely different things — things are situated on a positional axis on earth that is in a “horizontal” manner, this does not indicate that the earth is “flat”. — just to reiterate. This is at the core of the issue because the horizontal aspect gives people the perception that the earth is in a state of “flatness”.

        Like

      22. It’s a new week and i’m excited to deliver once more, thoughts of wisdom to the people of earth. This isn’t shit-stains in the maggot infested media and fake news stuff. This isn’t the retarded “geniuses” behind such flip-slops — i’m not thinking i’m fooling anyone while exposing myelf to be a truly clueless, foolish jackass just spreading lies, rumors and gossip. I’m not here to spread propaganda; all of what you see here are my original thoughts about life issues, that’s the background and the back-story.

        I’ve been getting enlightened to some things recently and as far as i’m concerned, hahahaha!, put all your worship in a real GOD, not a fucking “humanoid”, not these silly things with horse-heads and fish-heads and boneheads and shitheads that claimed to have created people. These sumerian things, these babylon things — they are no longer here, they’re out!, they’re gone!, i’ll especially leave it up to all those who are trying to play GOD and fool the masses, to figure out what the fuck that means. Those beings, they’re not real gods — the people of creation, the people of GOD, ALL life-forms that share the holy essence from the one-and-only, must know this is your time!, this era is your time, this is our time, do not live in fear!.

        I don’t care what people claim that the “military” is trying to “hide”, I don’t care what is being claimed that the “vatican” knows, for it is true that there are people in many industries, circles and factions who are there for the wrong vile reasons; we are aware of these people and by no means should we stop bringing certain things to the attention of the people, but I do not care about baseless rubbish, I do not care about fucking conspiracy theories — if they’re those trying to hide something, they might as well keep keeping all of that shit to themselves because it’s redundant, since I am encouraged to believe that certain bullshit was flushed away centuries ago and eons ago.

        You all ever wondered why all of these so called “gods” are not here?, there is only one fucking true almighty being and holy energy; everything else is fucking minimal, even the “immortals” are infact very “mortal” in the ire of the Eternal essence. There is a difference between being “immortal” and being “eternal”, the real almighty GOD is ETERNAL, it’s not just “holy” as a fucking “title”, i.e all of these people you’re calling “your majesty” and “duke”; he’s not these. The real creator is not into this, the real GOD is the eternal energy that’s the driving force of all life, even those fucking sumerian things that are gone (or were never here, actually), or whatever “mascot” for “the creation of humanity” some people think they know that they saw in an ancient text…

        Real history of life started long before this Mesopotamian stuff — that is the real GOD, that is where the real GOD truly was, and this real true GOD is still very much here, so all of this stuff inspired by ancient texts was definitely all inspired by something very grand and this was a product of a chain of events from way back in history. Through the eras, some took this power of knowledge to abuse and manipulate the people of their “civilizations”, but these are certainly not the people you should be worshiping.

        Fuck all of these retarded stupid azz monuments; the earth and all the galaxies ARE the monuments of the real GOD. Even if some insist we were created by sumarian “gods”, I got news for all of you; as the saying goes “honor thy mother and thy father”, so honor our forefathers, BUT disown all fucking ABUSERS, father mother or not — all glory must be credited to the eternal GOD.

        The temporary come and go but the real GOD remains. As long as there is life and time, and winds that blow across the land, and seeds that grow vegetation up to the sky, and the sun that shines, and the oceans that wash waves around the earth; these things are all UNDER the TRUE GOD, it’s because of him these things are risen, and these things cannot last and persist without this holy being. These things reflect the nature of the true GOD, not these capitalizing humanoid fucks.

        Like

      23. ok remind me to never mess with editing the time on my wordpress posts ever again — I thought I messed the whole thing up ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ‘€

        Like

      24. Thinking about this situation of the earth and its dynamics from time-to-time, I have always found it very interesting how the earth’s geometry actually is. It’s clear [to me atleast] that there is too much unevenness in the earth’s surface for it to be a true definition of “flat” if we are to look at the earth in its full velocity. Of course if you’re talking about a few acres or a few miles of land just ahead of you in your immediate area, it would be easy to point out the evenness of the terrain as an example of earth’s “flatness”, but if you are to look at the earth in totality, which is pretty enormous, then you see a more greater picture of its true natural formation.

        Just because you’re able to travel horizontally or vertical relative to a surface, this does not mean something is flat.; just because there are areas on earth that are flattish, this does not mean that these areas are an indication of the full “shape” of the earth and that the shape is a flat-disc, there are many shapes that could have flat areas, but with the flat areas themselves making up of a series of angular surfaces that construct a figure that is anything but a flat shape.

        Here is an interesting example of physics that we live with everyday that people don’t usually relate to this subject; I know of plenty of creatures on earth that run up and down and upside-down surfaces of different angles like it is nothing — surfaces that don’t always go in a straight line and have alot of geometrical protrusions, and this to me reflects the kind of situation that affects us (humans) aswell on the earth’s surface, expect on a much much bigger scale.

        Whenever you see a roach, or a rat just run up the side of a wall like its a regular surface as if its part of any other area around it, with little to know effort and most time without falling off or losing balance, this to me demonstrates the same exact physics that seems to be at play with how things are upon the earth’s spherical surface and the level of orientation they are subjected to, in a way that doesn’t make us think twice about it, just like how the roaches and ants and spiders run up and down walls like it’s nothing and like it’s natural.

        Everything on earth is in that same exact area of physics, although we hardly ever see it that way because we tell ourselves that unlike roaches, flies and and slugs, we can’t stick to walls in the same manner that these creatures can who seem to practically defy gravity and the laws of physics, whether a surface is upside down, slant or side-ways without even thinking about it but the truth and fact of the matter is that we ourselves are actually doing these same exact type of things when we take into account the earth’s size and shape and how we are able to move around on it (which is a big old sphere), without even realizing it or thinking about it, since we do it so naturally on a day-by-day basis and we are not able to see our true orientations from the vantage point of the full scope of the earth’s spherical shape, 24/7s, 365 days a year.

        LOL then fools want to say the earth is “flat” — bullshit!. The earth IS manually “flattened” in some areas by people to make civilizations — nature itself doesn’t create perfectly flat surfaces.

        I knew there was probably a realistic way to explain it so that people would kind of understand in a true sense what’s going on rather than “no it’s flat”, because I knew after leaning about alot of things through the years that that earth like many other planets are actually spherical and what not, that there was an actual interesting phenomenon going on with the situation when I had been noting certain things about that, which made me question the forces at play, because when taking certain things into account, I found that the earth being a sphere was really incredible ad I actually became somewhat baffled by what’s actually going on in terms of physics and geometry, but it’s just something I had to think about and today I wanted to break down the situation with whoever may be interested, to look at it realistically.

        Life is already interesting as it is — there is no need to make up bullshit conspiracy theories and stale old corny “illuminati” cliches, that you’ve probably heard so much about, these lies because that’s pretty much what conspiracy theories are, they’re lies and false witness, falsehoods and the spreading of gossip and unsubstantiated dogma, it’s not knowledge, it’s actually intellectually diminishing retardant.

        So this is just a little something to think about, I want you really read my observations here and actually digest it for a sec, and really try to see the example I have constructed here that puts into perspective the true dynamics at work in regard to the earth’s true spherical shape and how our situation of orientation is very very similar to the behavior of some natural creatures and how they traverse different terrains that are not always straight, but they do it so naturally and with so much ease, that to them it all seems leveled and “flat” and not that different to the surrounding areas, but we know that that’s not the case, and how their situation is actually quite like ours and how we are positioned on the surface of an actual spherical object (earth) without even truly realizing that, because we are able to move around on earth with such natural ease (atleast land wise).

        Like

      25. I’ll just tag this one as pure fucking FOLLY, or even pervasive dementia — anything but factual and reasonable since it is the furthest thing from the latter. And what can I be possibly talking about other than this utter retardation known as “the earth is flat!”, this is the topic today.

        The earth being “flat” is nutty as fuck, especially considering that the very basic, elementary school level definition of “flat” itself debunks the whole blissfully ignorant notion of the earth being “flat” along with the abundance of loads of proof already out there that it is factually spherical and round. You don’t need to be a fucking Einstein to conclude that nothing with these much mountains as the earth has, and deep oceans as the earth has, and things of that tangible nature, can reasonably be rounded off as truly “flat”. Just because you can move around the earth “horizontally”, or horizontal to a surface, this does not indicate total “flatness” of the physical surroundings. Plus alot of terrain on earth is not naturally “flat”. Many people get this inaccurate impression because of the wonders of technology and advanced modern excavation methods, that actually manually levels alot of the earth’s surface for use of construction.

        Not to mention that clearly what’s in space are planets and almost all planets have a rock surface and many of them are round as fuck and the furthest thing from “flat” imaginable, so earth having life does not prevent the way that physics work at all, so such notions are lame and pathetic since all it takes is elementary-style discernment to make it all fall apart in an instant. We know that many planets have different atmospheres which does not affect their physical shapes in outer-space, so the earth’s environment being “habitable” does not stop it from being a fucking planet like many of the other planets with different atmospheres.

        All planets have atmosphere; almost all planets are spherical in shape, and almost all are in space, just like planet earth, so this thing about earth being flat as nitwit as it is (by 2019 standards), seems to come from some “philosophical” place which explains why it’s so retarded rather than a comprehensive logical assessment, because as you know in this crap called “philosophy” (or what some clowns try to profess as “philosophy”), you can go around in circles all day with metaphorical gibberish such like “a car is not a car, its actually a land airplane with wheels” or “you didn’t actually ‘erase’ something, you made it ‘disappear'” — this is the autistic crap of “philosophy” in a nutshell.

        So earth being described as spherical is not some foolish wild philosophy, it’s based on actual facts that proves that it is. And second of all based on nature and the nature of how most planets are and how most bodies of voluminous matter are in space, whether we are talking about the sun (as we can actually see on a daily basis), whether we are talking about the moon (as we can see daily on nightly basis), whether we are talking about mars or other observed matter in space, most are mostly naturally round, so using this realistic train of thought, ofcourse this makes the most logical sense as a realistic reflection of the nature of the environment you’re surrounded by. It makes a heck of a lot more sense than the earth being “flat”, when you actually gain the knowledge — real “knowledge” not pseudo “philosophical” bullshit.

        Being able to travel horizontal to its surface is not a strong indication of true “flatness”, especially since we have seen the expeditions to the moon, we know the moon, we know the shape of the moon we know the moon looks round, and at the same time, living scientists were able to travel to the round moon within our lifetime, and still move around on it horizontal to its surface or perpendicular to it’s surface, so as round as the moon clearly is, it still did not prevent this motion even when fucking life was on it bouncing around within it, in astronaut suits. So saying earth isn’t round because life can move around on it horizontally, which somehow (in the minds of a philosophically unrealistic sector) means it’s not the same shape of the rest or it’s not in the same place as the rest (by that stupid logic), is pure nonsense since we all see how the moon is very round and astronauts were able to move around on it just like on earth. Some bitches just don’t have no basic sense.

        Like

      26. [An Ancestral FlashBack (4 of 4): Cross-roads X Cross-hairs]

        It’s an exciting time to get down to the facts and get to the point with more of my CRAZY views because I love to be crazy! — my style is just like my fucking views; unrestrained! ๐Ÿ’ฏโš ๏ธ. I don’t care who’s the pissy “psychologist” trying to psycho-analyze my un-normal DYNAMIC nature in hopes that would conform to some stiff standard to make them feel better about their own parasitic existence — I haven not seen any makeshift psychologist yet that’s good enough, yet alone significant to make a diagnosis I have to take seriously, so lets get into the topic! โœ”๏ธโœ–๏ธ๐Ÿ‰

        I’m just giving more data on this backstory issue of prehistoric humans who are often classified as “ape-like” and how they actually had a close connection with humans more than animals, and how they in my opinion based on alot of their behavior, were part of a much bigger and broader culture of human existence consisting of many ethnic groups, races and what not, and how much of their earlier habits and activity actually may have paved the way for much of the cultural developments and customs we see used and practiced in society in this modern era.

        At times (infact MANY times) the picture is painted of how they “evolved” into other human types, but one significant thing to also realize is that our group type has been actually linked to have co-existed around the same time as those extinct prehistoric humans and are said to have crossed paths, so we do have records that show that somehow these two groups (modern human genes and prehistoric human genes) did co-exist within the same time-frames and within the same literal physical locations in the exact same time, so this strongly shows that these prehistoric beings have alot more in common with humans than with any other life form — apes my ass ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ‘Ž.

        This goes all the way back to the scenario of “conflict” I was speaking of in another session, which is the same trend that carried on all throughout history, and which obviously shows that those prehistoric beings did not “evolve” into us. How the fuck can they have “evolved” into us and still be around to end up in battles with us, and then go extinct while we are still here?; that’s just some twisted crap with a pinch of time-travel lmao.

        Bearing that I mind, there is also circumstantial material that shows they were heavily crafty individuals. The further you go back in time, there is no denying that ancient humans, had a history of working with stone, and then over a lengthy period of time, this got elevated!. Over time we can also see that they got more chemically inclined and started to make cave paintings and things like that — this can also be considered as an example of another “incremental” development. I have seen in some cases (that I take with a grain of salt) findings that they eve started to develop ways and techniques of decorating themselves.

        This behavior and practice perhaps gave rise to different tribal identities, and territorial behavior and things like that; and then we get into the area of the bronze age etc etc. Early mans’ work with certain chemicals, could have been also linked to their discovery of precious metals. We often hear about material gold and silver etc, but along with the chemicals prehistoric humans used for paintings etc, there is also evidence that shows that ancient humans also know about chemicals like mercury. I’m of the view that that they may have gained some intellectual inspiration somehow to be invested in this area, leading encouraging them to become more chemically inclined, which may lead to all kinds of other developmental areas.

        So the more you go back in time, there is somewhat of a distinct trail that connects these ancient humans on a developmental level, which shows a vast spectrum of intellectual growth, some of which could be due to experience through trial & error, like for example they needed something to “cut” things, so they tried to use a piece of rock, and then they tried to develop ways to make the rock “sharper” (cut better), and then they discovered better quality rocks that they can play around with — some of the knowledge may have came from a higher intelligence that intervened through earths history, so we have contrasting instances where cataclysms entered the picture and instances, were likewise in similar fashion, leaps in significant intelligence was introduced that elevated cultural staples.

        Like

      27. Before I start, i’m just mentioning 3 things: (1) Reality, (2) Facts, and (3) Authenticity; there is no substitute for those, I don’t care how “fascinating” the case is, or how much questions one could bring up over it; fuckry is fuckry bottom-line xD.

        On the case of this “alien” stuff, again, I just find it very laughable to refer to something on earth as an “alien”. In many situations, regardless of how bizarre the occurrence is, or how unexpected it played out, there is no proof that such and such an object or entity actually came from space, and there is no proof that it actually came from another planet, but some people seem to think it’s logical to refer to it as “alien”. As a matter of fact, throughout history, no picture or photo of any supposed “air craft” or “flying saucer” has ever been factually shown arriving from out-of-space, yet alone coming to earth and entering earth from another planet, so I tend not to refer to anything I see on earth as “alien” because to me it’s just against common knowledge and wisdom.

        I can’t refer to anything on earth that I have only seen within earth, that appears to be within the confines of its corners, as an “alien”. I do not care what it looks like — I refuse to refer to anything that was only spotted on earth, or within the earth’s atmosphere as an “alien”. I don’t care what it is or what it looks like (or even what it sounds like) to anyone, or what capabilities it has that defy explanation; where i’m coming from is that if I have only seen it appear to have originated with-in the earth’s atmosphere, I cannot [so therefore also; will not] consider it to be a damn “alien”, because words have meaning, and the truth also means something, and I don’t think under such circumstances, the term “alien” can be appropriately applied to such a situation.

        All things taken into account, I can use the term “UFO” but that’s the problem, some people use the term “UFO” to implicate an “alien” and “flying saucer” connection, so even that word has too much stigma because of conspiracy theories. As far as i’m concerned, it just doesn’t make sense to refer to something you’re seeing on earth as an “alien”, or something that happened on earth as “alien” — there is a creator who is an originator, but i’m not so convinced of “aliens”. There is too much peculiar things originating on earth, and happening on earth, and STILL too much happening on earth for me to credit all of this to random “aliens”.

        I’m actually of the view that alot of this “alien” stuff is the stuff of fiction rather than reality, and is driven by this nonsense of “mars” and “martians”, and about the planet mars having fucking “martians”. Alot of this “alien” thing is based on this silliness, and as you are well aware, individuals who probe mars looking around, are having a hard time finding any aliens with technology out there, so it’s time to erase the bad information and get updated with the factual information. There is no one on mars, there is no one on “pluto”, there is no one on fucking saturn; so where are the “aliens” and why the fuck would they be this hard to find and that far off into no-mans-land?. These “humanoid” things some of these folks are looking for outside of earth, don’t exist.

        Aside from that, it’s ridiculous to me that some of these things that are clearly seen inside of the earth are classified as “aliens”, so i’m starting to look at things a bit more realistic in this area, and bringing it all the way back to reality. It can’t be an “alien” when it was spotted on earth, as far as I am personally concerned. It probably has far more of a relevant connection to earth than it does have with extraterrestrial associations, which is why you’re probably seeing it inside and around earth to begin with. I’m all for exploring the heavens, space and the universe and seeing what’s actually out there, but some of these things I’ve seen is little more than out-of-context, super corny, frivolousness.

        I can see through alot of B.S (and there is ALOT of it), once-in-a-while you’ll get alot of truly interesting material, that are actually real cases of phenomena but alot of the time, alot of what you see pushed out these days is alot of garbage, and I’m extremely hesitant at making the leap to conclude that every single thing I see that I can’t explain is an alien or is because of an “alien”. Some individuals, from the time and moment and second that they spot some kind of blemish or optical obscurity in a photo or the slightest distortion or particle obstruction in some form of film or video, that you can clearly see isn’t any kind of credible phenomenon and is actually just something that’s a little out of focus or only appears strange because of bad lighting or how it was edited and things like that (literally common things that aren’t that “unexplainable”), or even in some cases material that you can see is “staged”, it’s immediately classified as an alien and a “cover up” and it suddenly [in the minds of some folks] becomes an entire conspiracy being hidden from the masses by “illuminati” or some other blatantly nincompoop conclusion xD. I do not subscribe to such rubbish.

        Like

      28. YEAHHH!! :D, lets get into some sophisticated reasoning for a sec. This is an extra session to add some additional context to a recent topic I did about trading and why money may have been introduced into civilized cultures to replace the old-fashioned method of trading. The related session is over here: https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/comments/comment-page-8/#comment-651

        Providing an extra perspective is something I like to do and something I get inspired to do from-time-to-time on certain topics (it’s additional stuff that often occur to me after-the-fact) if I feel there are aspects of the issues that could use more insight, because reinforcing the fundamentals is healthy for the mind since having a basic understanding and comprehension of what you’re doing and how things function, could aid you a very long way in approaching situations more realistically, smart and comprehensively.

        When it comes to the issue of money and trading and what I told you about in my last session, someone might wonder “then why not use ‘rocks’ as currency”; the reason why plane old rocks isn’t used, is because of the root of the original idea behind money — money is based conceptually on things that are valuable that EVERYBODY wants.

        Actually the overall principle is based on what the person you’re trading with wants, and obviously there is going to be very few people who find value in plain old “rocks”, I mean yeah you could try to use rocks, but that would become very messy because rocks are all over the place, so pretty much using rocks without some sort of stable regulation would be a perfect representation of how trading would end up — nothing short of confusing and all over the place xD. There has to be a way to make it “fair” thus why it had to be developed into a system, so that way, someone can’t just give you any old rock, or a situation is created where you worked really hard to develop something very valuable and some dude who did absolutely nothing could just pile up a bunch of rocks to give you and basically grab that item of great importance, for a steal! lmao. So the system has to make sense and be fair, if not it would be pointless — you can’t just do any old how.

        When it comes to things people find value in, it’s a case where people would use things like: fruits, minerals, machinery, tools etc, so coming up with the concept of “money”, is a business sense, where you’re going to be using something that systemically has a high value that everyone can use (in a business sense), to trade in place of, or representative of, very valuable things in a civilized system.

        So interms of business, humans have agreed in a civilized society (and remember this has started way waaaay back in time), that because of various challenges etc, that their “money” is the neutral and universal standard of trade and is the highest valued property. So that way, things in society isn’t just left up to someone to just come up with very random impractical and unreasonable things for trade, and in some sense it also makes sure that some people can’t have a monopoly on certain things (deepening on how you look at it) because it actually empowers individuals with the opportunity to dynamically have trade flexibility in this area, so if one guy is charging 1 type of thing for a certain commodity, you would not necessarily have to settle for his offer, someone else could have the freedom to put a different offer on the table that might be more compelling (money wise, as an option). See by introducing a universal-currency, then on a systemic principle, we could all just agree on a reasonable “default value” as a means of trade according to the situation. Ofcourse people can break this default societal trend and revert back to the basis of using whatever resource he or she thinks would be useful, but the instrument of “money” or “currency” provides another option, plus it’s a high trade value property, that can be used for many other things (in a business sense) and not just 1 or 2 very specific things that a very specific individual has in mind. So in this case, it just depends on what the two parties (or more) are looking for, because of course, there are certain things money can’t buy :D

        I did not research this topic before-hand, so i’m sure you’ll probably come across other bits of information about the history of money else where. This was all off the top of my head (as with most of my material), and mainly me stating what I personally felt about the concept of money and what I felt may have inspired it. These were actually some thoughts on the subject I had in the back of my head for almost a decade now and recently I just got the inspiration to talk about this aspect of trade and money, so I just did what I do best — made a script about it LOL

        As always I just wanted to give you my feelings about why it [currency/cash/money] may have actually been developed, and some of the issues that it could have been inspired to resolve, because typically all you hear about is how money was developed by some “secret cult” to control socoiety and this kind of stuff, but I wanted to actually give a comprehensive examination of the issue and what truthfully may have inspired its original purpose. I do believe that alot of things was done because of money and by people and those who just want and wanted to enrich themslevs and greedy shits and what not, that actually not a secret at all, but I don’t think any of these scenarios actually had anything to do with the true origins of money, or addresses the core issue of how it all began, which is why I decided to share with you my thoughts about this aspect in particular.

        Like

      29. [An Ancestral FlashBack: (3 of 4): Lots Of Rudimentary Relativity]

        Fuck the inept pestilence — lets start today off correct with some opulent sustenance!, because i’m for the people because GOD is for the people. Shitheads have never been a serious factor on any level, except the fucking sewage level. knowledge is key, toxic fuck-ups are irrelevant.

        For today’s topic we’re going to look at these prehistoric beings, often referred to as “ape like” (who to me are misidentified — they are either just animals or they are just humans with no relation what-so-ever) and how they may have alot more in common with actual humans (maybe because they probably were actual fucking humans xD) than we may realize and than we may think, and than we are taught to believe.

        The habitual ways of prehistoric humans shows that somehow they were aware of certain trends far longer than anything in the sumerian texts suggest about human existence. These prehistoric humans knew about clothes for one, so their conscience was awakened to the fact that they were vulnerable and needed to protect themselves in better ways or whatever case maybe. According to the sumarian text and in the biblical texts, this only occurred to humans when they ate fruit from a certain tree, but prehistoric humans had this exact same mindset before any such events took place on earth in the garden of eden (which according to some people was located in some place in ancient sumeria), timeline wise if we are to try to connect their legacy with the estimated time for actual sumarian activities which seem to often come with a time-stamp of a few hundred-thousand years at most, while there were prehistoric humans lasting on earth for approximately millions of years (so the two legacies do not fit), yet logically comparing behaviors of the two groups of humans, this shows that ironically, prehistoric humans had a very identical experience to what the so called modified humans (modified from ape genes according to the sumerian text) also experienced around the time the sumerians created said modified humans . But since prehistoric humans were on earth before the sumerians arrived (indicated by biological dating metrics), it makes the sumerian texts seem as though to be a story based on incorporating inspirational elements of real life events, that actually happened in earth’s prehistoric history.

        Remember according to the sumerian text, the genes of us modern humans were not in existence before they came, and there were no humans in their time before their “gods” decided to create modern human workers (which would be those ancient sumerian humans and us) in their likeness to mine gold; “workers” who essentially were the only actual “humans” around at the time, and they created us out of their DNA mixed with APE-DNA, so if you read the Sumeria texts, they made absolutely no mention of prehistoric humans at all. According to what is written in the texts, there were no humans and according to what they wrote, their gods had to create humans by using their humanoid DNA and mixing it with ape DNA and clay, which resulted in the only human-life to be on the earth at the time — again this is according to them. This is important because we know today that there were humans on earth way before the sumerian civilization because of some of the oldest human remains being found all throughout other places on earth (except for in sumeria itself), and are biological findings that are older than just about everything found in sumeria thus far, which is very odd, which raises high suspicions about what the sumerian texts are claiming, or what the people who translated the texts say the writings state. It is even more bizarre when you consider that there are signs of groups from the prehistoric human lineage, taking part in activities dating back to not only before, but also DURING the time frame of when these sumerians were around until they completely dies out.

        We see accounts of prehistoric man making tools, and the assumption supposedly is that they used tools to hunt, but I find it hard to believe that these prehistoric humans would come into existence automatically even knowing anything about “meat”, and maybe even possibly that meat wasn’t actually necessary for them, and perhaps some of the tools were actually developed so that they can protect themselves somewhere down the line from threats, both of the human kind or of the animal verity, but perhaps before that, there might not have been such “tools” or weapons, needed to provide food through hunting etc, IF they actually ate fruits, which the jaws of all humans are said to be best suited for. How do a group of beings who are said to be more ape-like more than anything, and probably not just physically but possibly even mentally, develop a mind-set to even eat fucking meat anyways??????. So yes ladies and gentlemen, I am suggesting that perhaps meat-eating cave man and cave woman, actually may have began eating fruits first!, which is also ironic because even if they started out as “apes”, it would mean even in that case that “fruits” would have probably been their first instinctual inclination aswell, so prehistoric humans probably did start out eating fruits. How in the krap did they make a leap from eating fruits, to discovering that meat was edible is beyond me! (unless they had some idea because they saw other animals doing it). I would assume that it may have been discovered by accident through sacrificial cannibalism, certain rituals, or similar experiences, ways and customary practices that came into their way of life.

        We need to put this into perspective because I mean, give it some thought; these humans were created on earth at the time where the earth was pretty much theirs to rule, with no politics, or territorial disputes getting in the way (on a political level), so it’s like they were actually the RICHEST and wealthiest people and humans to ever exist on the earth, because they had alot working in their favor and nobody or any laws and such to really stop them. All of the earth was pretty much theirs (boy if only they realized things from this perspective at the time, lord knows how history would have turned out or what their life would have been xD), so their need to eat “meat” and to make weapons to hunt for meat, would have been something that was not even perceptible to them at this stage — even in the bible, humans were encouraged to nourish themselves from vegetation, and the scenario of meat-eating didn’t appear until many many years later.

        So unless prehistoric humans wondered off or something really strange happened, we have to assume that man’s history with GOD actually started with prehistoric humans (a.k.a the so-called ape-like people evolutionist are trying to say that we evolved from), which in contrast to what we have assumed of ancient texts, is actually mind blowing.

        Now in the case of using tools, it if often seen as things to use to create and craft structures as well (for living/shelter etc), but we do not really know how the earth’s atmosphere and landscape was back then to a 100% accurate degree, because if the sun wasn’t as hot then and there wasn’t any big weather issues like storms etc happening at that time, then these individuals who to me were literally humans and not apes, would not have had to really build structures; they probably could have used natural formations for shelter etc, I guess that’s why they started to use “caves”. Them using “caves” to live in, is a traditional view, but apparently it would appear that there was a habit that came into play that developed the use of using “stone-structures” to live in and conduct all kinds of other activities at some point. This would be where the ancient stone-carved rock structures, and a degree of expressive/crafty stone utilization phenomenons came into play and started to take root.

        I was considering that, as the sumerian texts states, the early humans that they created couldn’t reproduce on their own, and so that might be why some of the ancient people became extinct and that these so called ape-like people could actually be the individuals that the sumerian text was referring too in that instance, I was trying to give the sumerian texts the benefit of the doubt, but in reality, there is evidence that prehistoric humans had consisted of both male and female individuals, which is a strong indication beyond a shadow-of-a-doubt that prehistoric humans were not only capable of reproducing, but were naturally meant to reproduce from the start as intended by their original creator — I don’t think that there is any creature or life-form on the face of planet earth that wasn’t and isn’t meant to reproduce. just to put things into an even bigger context. Now this brings focus back to a situation where in earth’s very early history, there was more than likely only a couple of prehistoric humans that may have existed in earlier times, before they multiplied to a much higher population, which is ironically very identical to the biblical stories.

        I must reiterate that if the presumed prehistoric findings of remains, that the people researching in the field of archeology and what not discovered, had any “ape features” it would indicate to me that these may have been the actual remains of animals and not humans, who are being classified as “ape-like humans” for the sake of some faux “link” to real humans, all for the purpose of lending some amount of credibility to theories of “evolution”.

        Like

      30. I think i’ll just play around with more themes — the “Pique” theme is good in some areas but I can’t seem to get other features to function properly, so for the time being, it’s just not working out ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ. I actually wanted to use the theme because it has great potential but it has issues, so for the time being I need to experiment with some of the other layouts lol.

        Check the Update Log: https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/update-log/

        Like

      31. I have switched to a new theme — it’ll take me a while to get this place fixed up xD. Right now i’ll use this phase to look through the options and see the its full options and features. Keep an eye on the “Update Log” section: https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/update-log/

        Like

      32. Keep your eyes on the truth!, this is my passion. Now don’t get me fucked up, i’m not a prick, because you can be “real” in alot of things, you can be real useless, you could be real shitty, you could be real fucking retarded, but i’m “realistic” there is a huge difference, this is a whole different level of attitude and mindset — ZERO TOLERANCE for dumb nonsense in a nutshell and GOD is the only way as far as I am concerned, I don’t give two shits about no other form of lifestyle,;i’m a cutthroat individual, I can stand by my oaths asap with no problem — it is entirely EASY for me to do.

        Today what i’m going to correct is more about the controversy surrounding sugar and what-not. Sugar in your body does not really count as a fattening substance even though they can be counted as “calories” — the point I am getting at here is similar (or no different) to the old play-on-words some of the doctors use to use when it was said that cholesterol was bad, and then some of them would try to say that there is “bad cholesterol” but there is “good cholesterol”, or that there is “bad fat” and there is “good fat”; well using their own tactic, what the fuck i’m saying is that sugar is not a “bad calorie” :D. It’s equivalent to salt in your body in the sense that these are not fattening substances, so give-or-take some “salt” or “sugar” included into your food, as I said, you cannot lose weight from taking away sugar out of your food, or gain weight just by putting sugar into your food — they do not “count”.

        The main issue is how much you are consuming of the food that you are eating, which is the factor that creates the problem, because the bodies of people who have the tendency to gain weight, do not metabolize the food in a way that it can properly efficiently utilize the food, so basically this “build-up” seems to indicate a very “slow ” manner or rate of food manipulation in the body, so the idea is that it’s not sugar specifically that is making people fat; if you over-eat, this is what is making people fat. It is obviously not something you can solve by just removing sugar out of your diet.

        I also don’t believe that “soft drinks” is the reason why people are getting fat; I believe that mostly the “edible food” is the main reason for obesity, not this stuff about “soft drinks”. So basically if you fill up with compact-food, and then later you fill up with more burgers and bagels and compact-food, and then later you fill up with more of the same food; obviously because your body takes a while to process that food timely, it will pile-up and pile-up and pile-up. This is basically what is causing obesity — by then, the sugar from drink etc, would have long filtered out of your system before alot of these other elements in the bread and in the burger and in the Max-&-cheese, even start to digest.

        Often as-of-late, the assumption is “what all of these foods have in common is that they have sugar”, and i’m like “the bigger thing they have in common, quite obviously, is that people are just eating all of these food, and ALOT of these foods, because people like food alot”, but obviously if you are biting off more than you can chew, or biting off more than you can digest, or biting off more than you can metabolized; you will have issues. This thing about sugar being the sole cause of obesity is just nonsense — there are foods that are far higher in “sodium/salt” than in sugar content and these foods still make these people with these weight issues, fat. It’s “don’t bite off more than you can chew”, rather than “its too sweet”.

        There is some chatter about “sugar in fruit and the sugar is honey is not the same as sugar in drinks etc”, which is a very pitiful reasoning because the fucking sugar in food and drink, is from the same fucking natural crops the earth produces like other fruits and vegetables. The reality is, none of these things are truthfully “bad”, the real issue is that folks have a “condition” which causes their bodies to handle certain volumes of food in a way that makes their bodies retain matter from the food for a long duration of time, and the key is to find a balance to even-out and level-out what their bodies have to manage over time, so the only way to get around this is to just eat lesser amounts of compact foods, or eat a diet that consists of strictly vegetables (also in moderation, due to the sensitive nature of this condition that varies form person to person, although with vegetables you are unlikely to develop any weight gain at the same rates as the consumption of compact foods).

        The problem with some compact-foods is that some of them don’t deliver a wide range of nutrients, so it’s like you’re consuming the same “limited” things in abundance, which stores up. So they are not “junk” food, it is just that you have to switch-it-up, which is why having a balanced diet is the best, so it’s good to have the “burger”, but you should also try other types of edibles like: carrots and beans, pumpkin, and potatoes aswell and many other vegetables AND fruits as frequently as you possibly can, along with proper water intake. The best way to give your body sufficient water, is when you naturally get thirsty, do not FORCE yourself to drink water just to keep up with some general health recommendation. If you are suffering from the flu or you are very sick, this is the only exception where you should try to force yourself to drink water. Again all in moderation especially when it comes to the compact-foods which are already bulky, so you might have to cut your hamburger in half and eat piece now and save the other piece for later, or some technique like that.

        Again realize that i’m not just reading articles online and adhering to foolish crap pushed out in the media for “shock” value. The FACTS are that I am nowhere close to being obese, diabetic or fat and I consume LOTS of sugar, lots of meat, and eat lots of snacks all the fucking time from since I was under the age of 10, and every goddamn time I go to get tested, the results are the same damn thing each time, which is to say that I am considerably healthy, especially when you take into account my diet ad how I am still able to maintain a level of remarkable health despite these many things, which contain “sugar” that I eat frequently.

        I get all kinds of blood tests done, and nobody at these places know any specifics of my fucking diet before-hand or even after I get tested, and the fact that the results are often very good, basically gives them no reason worry about this so the question doesn’t even seem to cross their minds. Not oly do the results on paper look great, but I also feel very good, so what i’m telling you isn’t merely a “statistics” thing. So there is very few people qualified to tell me shit about this area — I don’t care what degrees you have or what profession you’re in; I do not gain weight because of “sugar”, and I do not have any heart problems because of meat, I have no signs of cancer and I still have very good eye sight, sense of smell, feel, touch etc. So it will take a whole lot more then “studies” and “surveys” to convince me knowing the things that I do, that this anecdotal crap actually holds any weight (no pun intended :D). If sugar is as bad as SOME people claim it is (who obviously do not know what the fuck they are talking about), then I should be one of the most obese people on earth, however the reality is, I am not!.

        So somebody is missing something and I don’t think it’s me. The mare fact that some of these folks in the medical field have to keep revising their “discoveries”, and one moment it’s one thing and then the next moment it’s now something else, while my personal health has remained consist over the years, shows that some sources within the industry are the ones fucking up, who got it fucked up — not on my end.

        Also when you hear people say that they “cut sugar out”, that is a very vague statement. Them cutting sugar out of their diet usually means that they just stopped eating a wide rage of certain compact foods (that just happen to contain sugar) and because they deprived themselves of these foods, they were not able to eat too much of them, therefore avoiding weight gain because they deprived themselves of eating too much calorie-packed foods. Obviously they just don’t understand what it is that they are actually doing, or what it is that’s actually happening to their bodies when they do that, hence the statement “I cut out sugar out of my diet and lost weight” which is obviously very misleading and not the whole picture. So don’t be fooled by this vague nonsense.

        Like

      33. Some people need to lose weight, that is TRUTH!, but some people need to lose their jobs because they are in the wrong place. There is no place for deceptive practices and the spread of falsehoods, so do some people need a wake-up call or something?, because that might be it more than anything else!, with the pompous trite that they are peddling.

        Lots of misinformation and foolishness (perhaps even lies) is pretty much what’s out there in terms of this obesity issue. There is no real-life proof that sugar is the cause of any harmful consequences to the human body.

        Tooth decay is not a proof that sugar is the cause of anything harmful in the human body, it’s proof of poor hygiene and it’s a fact that once you have poor hygiene, you’re going to encounter problems no matter what you eat.

        You don’t need a doctor or a scientist to tell you “sugar is bad” or “sugar is not bad”. If You go on a diet and you take most of the sugar out of the food (or ALL of it out), you will see that it will not work in making you lose weight, so pretty much you’re being misled or lied to when you are told that sugar is the cause of your obesity, and it’s with in your best interest to not take that very bad advice seriously.

        I would even propose to go a step further and get some of these clown politicians and clown people in the media, and some frauds in the medical industry, who are putting this misleading information out there, out of their occupation — they are in the wrong profession. People need to start losing their jobs for telling people that “sugar” is the cause of obesity when there is no proof that sugar is the primary cause of obesity, or even a factor in obesity at all.

        I think the wake up call will come for some of these fools in the media and the politicians and people in the medical industry, when they face serious implication for not doing proper investigating and research and at the same time proceed with the malpractice of putting out these very serious deceptions, that will cause individuals to do more harm to themselves then good, since this is not the time for politics and games.

        I will say this again, if you eat too much calories; basically if you have the gene to get fat and you eat too much food, you will gain weight. To think that it’s just sugar that’s making people “fat” is retarded, stupid and silly, all at the same time because it”s very easy for you to cut-down on sugar and eat the same exact foods, and then realize that you will still be gaining weight. That is because sugar and weight-gain have virtually zero relation.

        It does not matter what some joker is telling you of “sugar breaks down into fat” — I don’t have to care about what the fool is telling you. Go on a diet and remove sugar from your diet (like I have recommended in one of my very last sessions of this subject), and see that as long as you are eating the same exact food and you continue to eat alot of it, you will continue to gain weight — you do not need to be a doctor to see this.

        It’s been PROVEN for a long time that once people reduce how much they eat at one time, it works SIGNIFICANTLY in helping people with weight gain issues, to gradually lose weight. This is something that has been done for a long time by people who tried to lose weight, and they were successful, this is how you know that it works (DUH it’s because it actually works!), and it has been working for a long time even before all this retarded unsubstantiated garbage using some unreliable form of sub-standard “science” about “sugar being the cause of obesity”.

        Your overall eating habits, in terms of how much you eat and how often you eat, is the key to losing weight. Moderation if the only proven thing that works for EVERYONE especially people trying to lose weight.

        This foolishness about sugar is pure stupidity, you cannot lose weight by just removing sugar from compact foods that are loaded with calories; as long as you exceed a certain amount of calories, and meet a dietary threshold, you will just keep gaining weight. The only difference between the people that lose weight and those that don’t, is that the ones that do, actually make it their mission to put in the effort to change the habits; it’s not a “sugar” issues. Viewing it as a sugar issue is a dumb-down view of the situation that does not work — it’s about the “lifestyle”.

        “Addicted” to sugar is just a desperate attempt to make people believe that there is something wrong with liking things that are tasty, who are not buying their crappy bullshit about “sugar is bad” as it is an incessant mess of poorly researched dogma (even GOD made natural fruits sweet as fuck; as a matter of fact, I sometimes encounter natural fruits that are far “sweeter” than most manufactured treats). Saying people have a sugar “addiction” is just silly and it does nothing to actually strengthen the dimwitted case that there is any true link between sugar and weight-gain on a factual bases. So all of that is just alot of spity lip, to compensate for a severe lack of true plausible and provable facts.

        If I was any one looking to lose weight, I would watch out for the false advertising. Anything marketed as “zero sugar” or “low sugar” is actually false advertising because they are trying to make you believe in a false-premise that it’s “healthier” for you because it has “zero sugar” or “low sugar”. None of these snacks or foods are “healthier” or “healthy” just because they do not contain sugar or salt, so again either these people are extremely incompetent, or they believe that you are stupid enough to fall for there incompetent stunts (because either way you look at it, there are exhibiting lots of incompetence).

        You might say “what about the people with diabetes?” — I say “the people with diabetes” have a “disease” and would be eating these known snacks at their own risk. A diabetic does not need a chocolate bar, sweeties or cake. These are obviously not things that should automatically come to a diabetic’s mind who are concerned about their health. They should not even be looking in this direction. However if they insist, just because it has “no sugar” it does not mean it still won’t affect the diabetic in another negative capacity, IF the diabetic is also affected by weigh-gain issues etc, since sugar has not been proven to cause weight gain and it has not been proven that just reducing sugar or removing sugar from a food, lessons the impact of an individual from gaining weight from that same exact “no sugar” or “less sugar” food — if you don’t practice moderation, you will gain weight!.

        I think alot of the initiatives you see surrounding the reduction of sugar etc in products, is not in all cases because these people entertaining such reductions buy into the bullshit, but more so because they are just trying to not give the politicians (and whoever else) anything to blame them over and are trying to dissociate themselves from this responsibility because they are not in the business of making health decisions people, since that would be very stupid since there is no one diet that is adequate for everyone and which is why the responsibility is on the individuals to make better decisions on their own for themselves since many of them know what to do, but choose not to do it,

        So to my mind, what they are doing trying to limit liability as required by law (laws don’t necessarily make sense) to limit any opportunity for politics and the frauds to point the finger at them, so that when people continue to fuck their own selves up, these stupid politicians ad frauds (who should all lose their jobs for spreading nonsense) can’t blame the “soda” or the “hidden sugar” in the coffee, and stupid reasons like that. And as a result, eventually they will run out of things and people to blame and look even more feeble as people continue to fatten-up. But hopefully by then, them and those who invested alot of time and effort into this nonsense, would not have run out of time to reverse and actually fix their issues…

        I’ll just leave it here for now because like I said recently on the same subject (or as you can see) I have alot of ammunition because there is just lots of fucking stupidity being spread around about this subject that I get very excited to CORRECT!, because I love to be correct lmao. Yeah I don’t take being wrong likely; that’s just my style, this is why i’m so realistic, it’s because i’m thorough when it comes to reality.

        Like

      34. I doubt the thing that originally created a lion was lion ๐Ÿฆ, I doubt the fucking thing that originally created a cow was a cow ๐Ÿ„, and I doubt the fucking thing originally created a giraffe was a giraffe (LOL). I doubt the fucking thing that originally created a snake was a snake ๐Ÿ. So what made humans originally, was not necessarily “humanoid”, just as what originally created planets wasn’t necessarily a planet.

        What all of these have in common is that, most likely what made life as-a-whole, had life — INTELLIGENCE! I say :D. The intelligence is a powerful thing to waste!. It’s a 50/50 equation; 50%-consciousness + 50%-PhysicalManifestation = a WHOLE lot of REALITY ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ‘

        Like

      35. HELLOOOO! to all of you :D. I am planning to switch to a new theme. Read more about it over in the “Update Log” department : https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/update-log/

        Like

      36. [An Ancestral FlashBack: (2 of 4): Possibility Of Capabilities]

        I get excited for GOD, that’s the stuff we all should get excited about, Full stop, period!. Not “point blank”, my point’s aren’t fucking “blank”, my points are “pointy” and pointed as fuck, and sharp. It’ll pick a prick’s fucking eye out — mental sharpness, point taken :D.

        Speaking on the issue of some of the earliest people to ever walk the earth; there is talk about whether or not they knew how to talk; I am of the view that the purpose of humans as a life-form, is intelligence, our strong point is almost exclusively our brains, and what we lack naturally physically, to gain the upper hand in earth’s vast environments, situations and what not, we almost always use our brains to make up significantly and compensate for the lack of physical adaptations with our powerful intelligence by using our brains to apply innovation and thoughtful ways to get around certain issues, and communication is a big part of that process. If you’re going to be fruitful and multiply as a human society into millions and millions, then communication is going to become very vital in order to reach and connect with so many souls. So I believe that these very ancient human beings did have some sort of way to communicate, and I also believe that they had alot of mental capability even though such intellect may not have been enlightened/exposed to certain things, and certain things may not have been reveled to them, just like how it’s said that even us humans in modern times today, only use a small percentage of our brains.

        I mean just because they didn’t appear to have an elaborate system of writing, it does not mean that they were unable to speak, talk etc, because writing is a form of storing information, and if they didn’t really have much need to store any information or recap any information, then they would not really get the idea to do so, especially if they were not doing all that much that could be considered important. So to me, their brains were probably more than capable of developing communication, if not, there would be no point in the existence of these prehistoric humans as “humans”, they might as well be animals because that’s exactly what they are going to live like without properly being able to structure themselves because of lacking the capacity to master or control this one basic nature of the human ability.

        The next issue on the table is that often the narrative is “such and such a civilization just popped up out of nowhere”, but we must remember that it might just seem that way because of how broken up and messy our archeological elements are usually encountered after years and years of erosion, theft and just damage done by general human and animal, and natural earthly activity and what not. There is just alot of data missing, and the fact is that humans have been estimated to have been on earth for even millions of years — now if you look at it from that context, that is actually an extremely long time for lots-and-lots of things to actually have developed over-time on a day-by-day basis through, trial-and-error, discoveries — you name it!, and like I said in one of my other sessions, there are ancient structures that actually predate the ancient mesopotamia buildings.

        Some practitioners in various fields of ancient historical study, typically refer to the sumerian structures as “advanced”, but in one of my last sessions where I was talking about “civilizations”, I made a point in stating that there was actual “cultures” that had existed before mesopotamia, and in one of my other older sessions, I actually stated that earth’s history is rich, and we often do not know what next we might find — we definitely don’t have it all figured out. Alot of these ancient points-of-view written into ancient texts about creation, life, the stars etc, could have been inspired by events that are even far older than they were in reality, even if these ancient cultures and societies might not have been fully aware of this.

        So taking all of that into account, people probably did not “evolve” but actually stayed human and just got better at thinking and doing things over time, perhaps by either through practical experience, or by inspirational increases of intellectual thinking, or a combination of both, in some cases perhaps by an unconventional event that most might categorize as spiritual or divine etc; of course there are those who may believe this could be “alien”, but you know I don’t believe in “aliens”, so I tend not to go with that narrative xD.

        Here’s the other issue, there appears to be no complete break in human history, because the further you go back in history, is the more you would find an ancient culture of some kind. If you go back from us, you have the “ancient greeks” and “ancient romans”, the period of “the knights templars”, “medieval” times etc, then you go back even more and you butt-up on the “ancient masoamericas”, then slightly further on you’ll encounter the “ancient egyptians” etc, and also the “ancient sumerians” (a culture which seems to have actually existed along with the ancient egyptians; atleast according to the bible’s collection of accounts), then when you go back again, you’ll encounter stone ages individuals and prehistoric man (hahaa i’m not an archeologist or a historian so my timelines of some of these ancient cultures might be off, but just by reading the context you will get a clear understanding of the overall point i’m making) — somewhere in these phases of history, ancient floods and ancient disasters occurred, as well as ancient “breakthroughs” concerning innovations, inventions so-on and such. So you all should get the picture.

        What is interesting is that around the time there were so-called cave-people populating earth, who seemed to have a passion for using caves etc, or the good sense to do so, there are mysterious cases of stone-carved-structures also existing within the same vicinity of TIME-LINE, and then following on from these events, that’s when [at some point], the concept of free-form architectural construction, started coming up and gaining more traction (meaning the ability for people to actually do real dynamic construction that does not rely on carving-out rocks from existing stone structures like: Underground Cities carved through bedrock, hill-sides, cliff-faces etc).

        Now I personally think the ability to carve through solid super-hard rock, and make all kinds of temples and Underground Cities etc, is super cool, but that’s besides the point :D. I do not think that such ability to work through stone like that was necessarily “technology”; such “technology” doesn’t jet get “lost”. I think literally only 1 or 2 sources had this ability which is why later-on methods of block-building were developed as a skill that could be thought to the general population, however if it was technology I have my theories of what might have happened here, but this is a whole different topic.

        Like

      37. [An Ancestral FlashBack: (1 of 4): Perplexing Parallels]

        hahahahahehehehe nothing can replace the realistic meds — it’s just gold!. That’s why whenever some folks hang up on whoever the bullshit is they were listening to, and they get a true sense of purpose and a real shot of reality, it TRULY wakes them up like nothing else!. It’s like a fucking SURPRISE for them and all unsuspecting fuckers on freaky crap. It’s like they sit and reason to themselves “hey, these halfwit bitches I was listening too, can’t operate on this level, they’re jokes, but this rebel is authentic!”.

        I’m more than delighted to bring GOD’s people this session today, so lets read on shall we? :D. Now it’s hard to ignore the beginnings of prehistoric humans and the situations and circumstances that are spoken about in the bible. The sumerian text could have infact been works of wisdom based on even earlier knowledge from even earlier times, so lets also put an asterisk on that point. And When it comes to the bible, it’s not a question of if it’s more recent than the sumerian texts, but how much “accuracy” is actually inside, given the nature of the inspiration that brought the materials together at totally different times.

        The excuse for some is that the books of the bible have mistranslations because the people back then did not understand how to translate some of the things in the books, but when it comes to the sumerian guys, some how their “translations” of the sumerian texts are not mistranslated and are more accurate because according to them, it refers to “aliens” and technology which (not shockingly) they really really like, and they translated something that they claim came befroe the bible, that they say the bible is based on. HA! still not fucking convinced.

        The prehistoric beings were clearly humans, that much to me is definitely clear. Their origins would have been almost identical to all humans, given their nature as being very close to ours, if not in-fact them being EXACTLY alike [to us] and they would have been exposed to things through their life that affected their behavior and what not. Maybe when they started to get involved with certain habits, it caused them to “develop” over time, because even in the events of adam and eve, the first thing that had an effect on their nature and way of thinking, was what?, it was said it was when they ate a fruit. Using that situation in contest with the per-historic humans, maybe, just maybe, as they too ate certain things and played around with certain things, this could have developed them and their way of thinking — interactions of that nature could have affected them almost as identically (in comparison to adam and eve), were they remained humans and there was no actual evolution, but because they got exposed to certain things, such experiences ultimately had an effect on their conscience and development over-time.

        I must say it is really compelling how much in common the history of these beings seem to share with identical sequences in the bible (in logical theory), and it could be that human history on this earth, actually does go even way further back than some of these findings of ancient humans, since the bible even seems to talk about the dinosaurs and we all know that the dinosaurs (along with most animals) all predate human activity on earth, even according to the bible. The sumerian text clearly mentions human-activity on earth as well, but nowhere in the sumerian text did it mention some of these prehistoric ape-like beings, who somehow actually predate some of what is found in sumeria BY MILES, even though sumeria is supposed to be where humans originated. There is talk that the anunnaki “modified” things to make us modern man in sumeria (or some where really close to that area), but the sumerians DID NOT modify these prehistoric humans to make modern humans, because if you look at some of the depictions that the sumerians depicted the anunnaki using with the story, you would see that they literally depicted an actual animal in one of their drawings of that specific creation scenario, not the modification of any of these prehistoric humans who actually predate alot of what is found in their [sumerian] culture (atleast on physical, scientific dating basis), unless you were to go with some of the historians and what they claim about some of the situations in the sumerian stories and how they are actually referring to events that happened “hundreds of thousands” of years earlier then when they were recalled in physically written form, which is extremely debatable.

        So could the bible itself actually have more accuracy within it than the sumerian tablets, even though the sumerian tablets were said to be what the bible was based on?, because if so, this is exactly what I was saying in one of my other sessions about the accuracy being more important in a case like this , and not just the dates, because even in the bible they talked about places in sumeria, and places in Babylonia, places in Egypt etc, almost as if it reads like it was narrated from the perspective of someone who wasn’t really native to sumer (sumeria), and there is also discussion sometimes among folks of how the “nephilim” spoken about in the biblem were reference to the so-called sumerian gods, and I had always found it strange that the Egyptians and other ancient cultures never really acknowledged the supposed sumerian gods even at the time that the sumerian gods were said to have been rulers.

        The accounts from versions in the bible, are told as if from a slightly different vantage point from a figure that may have been in a unique position to give a retrospective account, in the third-person, of these specific places, times and events, and ironically the only other people who would have been able to do such a thing, would have been individuals who were around these people at the time early in earth’s history, and the only culture that had a possible source that could have done that at the time and presented such minor but overall key details, would have possibly been somewhere in Egypt because the ancient egyptians and the ancient Sumerians are the only two true ancient “civilizations” that have artifacts that scientifically date back to around the same time frame, what’s just as equally ironic is that “Moses” was said to have had egyptan origin — so that’s just something to keep in the back of your minds for now..

        The sequences in the bible seem to relate to different time periods in earths history as far back as even the dinosaurs, which are all key pieces of information that adds key pieces of insightful context.

        Another thing is that not many of these ancient extinct humans were found near any “mining” sites, their drawings didn’t even depict them mining gold, and I don’t even think they had the incentive to cover-up something like that or hide something like that, instead, their works depicted them with bows and arrows and being among wild life. So around the time the sumerians were supposedly modifying DNA to make modern humans out of “apes” (because remember the drawings depict a actual animal, not ancient “ape-like humans”), these ancient humans were playing around in caves and making stone tools they were supposed to be “slaves” (because by the sumerian text logic, any “human” around at that time, should have bee “slaves” mining gold, not playing around in caves “painting” art) — there is even megalithic structures that predate sumerian artifacts, that proved that a wide group of prehistoric human beings on this earth were very active, paralleling the findings of cave activity, from more and more humans that seems to have been already on earth building stone structures and things like this.

        Lets realize this fact; there is also signs of ancient civilizations that sunk under the sea and these would have to be civilizations that are very old aswell that are probably on-par with, or even older than some of the ancient groups of people that have been found that themselves are already known to predate most of the sumerian findings, in addition to some ancient cave painting also done by prehistoric humans, also found under sea-level, plus the possibility of other fossil remains of actual humans that could be buried under tons of dirt and earth similar to the displacement of dinosaur fossils that are deeply swallowed up by earth — so it seems like the bible does have a collection of chapters that represent different phases in earth’s history from the beginning, to an accurate degree.

        Like

      38. Today’s session is more about “money”. Now there is often a very bad side to money that we often hear about, and rightfully so because it needs to be said, and heard about, of the many dastard deeds that are inspired in the shitty minds of a toxic demented depraved few, because of it.

        But there is also a very technical side to the area of money and currency that I want you to keep in mind, and it’s that, imagine for a sec, a place in society where the only way you can acquire things is through old-fashion-trade; so say a person has a bag of salt, and you need the salt but they want a certain quantity (and obviously they’re expecting quality) of something that you would never see in your life but does exist, or something that isn’t always readily available like a certain amount of fruits — imagine every time you need some salt, you had to contribute 10 mangoes, obviously depending on the circumstances, you’re not always going to be able to get 10 mangoes, but imagine if there was a Universal Currency like pennies or coins, then that being the case, you would not have to worry about how much goats you have, or if the mango tree grew enough mangoes every 200 months, since using mangoes regularly for everyday-matters, is not going to be that RELIABLE of a resource to sustain over a long period of time. Especially in the context of keeping pace with the demands of the day, notably in today’s environment with taxes, insurance and these types of priorities.

        However if you have a Universal Currency, you might be able to work for a day, a week or so, and depending on whatever it is you are doing, you might earn 100 pennies a day or per-week basis, which would make earning that bag of salt, alot more feasible for you now, because, the currency has now become an “officially recognized” resource, and you have reasonable ways to get said resource, and you’re not dependent on random natural environmental conditions to make a living. With Universal Currency, you can now be pro-active about acquiring a monetary means that has legitimate trade value, so instead of 30 mangoes for the bag of salt, Universal Currency wise it may only cost you 30 pennies out of 100 pennies to trade for the salt, or “30 cents” out of just 1 penny (or dollar so on and such), depending on the value of the currency and how it’s measured.

        By this same token, this allows just about any man or woman, and just about any individual on the street or anywhere, who doesn’t even have a piece of paper or plastic to his or her name, to actually work on earning a universal-penny so that he/she/they can atleast buy or trade (because “trading” is pretty much what you are doing whenever you offer money in exchange for goods or services — it’s the same exact concept that has been used since humanity’s beginnings) what he/she needs or something that they want, without worrying about needing a random specific form of live-stock or seasonal growth of a specific random fruit for every different situation and transaction, or better yet, you would not have to worry about only being able to trade a few mangoes just to get the one bag of salt from a specific individual, or likewise worry about the same style of trading if some other dude has some other idea in mind, for some other asset. With the universal currency being accepted as the general standard of “money”, you now can use that “money” to trade or “buy” a wide set of varied commodities almost anywhere, or even sell whatever you’d like at what ever value you determine to potential traders/buyers. So that is actually the good side of being able to use money or any type of universal currency for trade.

        Now of course there is always the idea that there would be no need for any money if people would just cooperate, and be honest, and if there was less greed etc, which I agree with 100% and is something I have been very aware of for a very long time, but unfortunately, that is not the reality that we face these days, due to a number of rotten bitches and a wide range of technical circumstances.

        A extra follow-up session to this topic can be read here: https://aktionkilla.wordpress.com/comments/comment-page-8/#comment-670

        Like

      39. [Lineage Resurrection: Lets Bring It Way Back] (2 Of 2)

        Hahaha I live for radical insights because that’s what the day demands. Terrific thinkers of the exciting-earth don’t care about the normal uninteresting regurgitated rotating radial ratshit. NAAP! that’s no fun, that is BORING ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ˜œ — we want radical!, we wish sensational!!, and we welcome phenomenal!!!, and you know, we’re always fucking crazy never mediocre, cuz normal is “bull”, crazy is “full” :D. We resist stupidity and glorify smartness!.

        Here’s the radical krap we’re getting into today — i’m going to delightfully share some of my personal insight with you all as to what may be going on with some of these ancient remains of long ago extinct humans, that are being classified as “apes” and ape-like, but who I do not believe were apes at all (as many of you may well know by now), and were probably more accurately different races and ethnicities of humans.

        I don’t believe that modern humans “evolved” from no fucking apes or any animal for that matter, and within the human timeline the key I believe is “when” us modern humans actually started to “die”, because depending on when us humans of today, actually started to die, and when we started to die more regularly, it would make perfect sense as to why researchers only started finding certain human remains within certain time periods, and could also exemplify how us modern humans could have infact been around in the same relative time periods as the older ethnic groups of human beings that practitioners call ape-like or whatever.

        I think a very valuable clue to this matter could be surprisingly referenced and paralleled within the bible itself, and how it talks about the timeline of the humans back then (if we were to believe the bible’s account as real valid historical accounts based on true things, and a product of true real wisdom), you would notice that humans in the past, in earth’s early history, whether that be thousands of years ago or millions of years ago, use to have the ability to live an extremely long time (in contrast to today) BEFORE they actually DIED of natural causes, whether that be well into their late 100s or well exceeding hundreds and hundreds of years. We have accounts of Noah and Adam etc, living for HUNDREDS of years, and instances even with a somewhat notable decline in longevity where Abraham and moses etc actually were said to have lived just well into their late 100s, which was still a considerably long time when contrasted to life expectancy in today’s times, and can still be used as a parallel reference to how longevity in the past for humans was naturally lengthy and were more likely to die of unnatural causes.

        So based on that, depending on how you look at it, this might explain why there is somewhat of a noticeable gap between the human races and racial groups in terms of dated-human-records, and it might actually highlight the fact that most of the deaths of those older extinct groups, were actually premature deaths due to whatever was going on culturally within those groups at the time, along with a range of other possible factors like catastrophes, the earth’s poles shifting and things like that. So this might put into serious question more, the translated sumerian accounts of humans actually evolving from apes and whether or not there is more grounds based on my hunch, to support that humans (including our current alive races of humans present on the earth now in 2019) were actually around even as further back as those extinct races of humans through earth’s earlier times.

        It is a very interesting perspective because if you look and pay close attention to the timelines in the bible, humans actually use to live for an extremely long time, which might explain why it took a while for certain patterns of human skeletal remains, to show up in the fossil records in certain areas.

        Further on this topic, using this bible account of humans living extremely long lives compared to today, we can even begin to see a critical trend, where, as the ability for humans to live considerably long declined, you would find a much greater concentration of human skeletal remains when approaching historical periods that are alot closer to modern times, which might explain why going further back in time, it appeared as though finding humans remains of certain races and ethnicities of humans was so scare, and it may be because of the fact that people were not dying as often as they are in modern times (of natural causes), according to the biblical account of the extremely long lives people lived naturally in earth’s early history, and why when it gets closer to our time, you then begin to see more and more types of human remains popping up from the different groups in greater volumes. to where we can profile and catalog them alot better, making it seem like we know more about such groups than some of the others.

        The bible time-spans don’t have to be that accurate in regard to what i’m saying because this is just to put into scope and scale what TYPE of situation we may actually be dealing, or the nature of the situation we may be dealing with here because my thinking is that you will not find “remains” of things if they were not dying, but in fossil findings, the claim is that there is an age-gap between findings of the different types of human “species”, therefore “evolution” is the answer, but my point-of-view is that there was no real evolution and that these different categories of humans were just individual distinct races and ethnicities who existed, and if that’s the case (remember i’m just thinking a little different here, it’s not really a 100% verified fact), and they had infact exited and not evolved, then the only way to explain the date-gap between human remains, is that somehow some of the groups were able to live for a while before they actually started dying, at which point allowed their “species” type to start showing up in the fossil records at a certain time, even though they may have somehow existed a good while before they died.

        Otherwise all we have to work with are theories for now and we already know there is the evolution theory of freak-mutations (which was developed in the evolutionist community, and which i do not believe happened to humans), then there is another theory I personally have which is that the distinct groups of humans were created individually on a gradual basis, or perhaps they were created around the same time and in a similar manner to how the animals on earth were created around the the same time, and if true, it would indicate that our origins began slightly different than conveyed in ancient historical text records. There could be a case where there was mixing of genes i.e cross-breeding etc, and as a result humans developed into a broader diverse group, but then again for that to even occur you’ll still need a pre-existing set of different groups anyhow, which would make this scenario [in particular] unlikely, which I believe is actually quite different than what an “evolution” actually is, i just view cross-breeding as genes mixing between diffident ethnic groups of the same exact type of being.

        If mutative evolution is not the case, then these so called “apes” we “evolved” from were actually infact apes, who had no relation to our existance which would mean they were just animals that evolutionist are trying to link to our history, and this realization would mean that humanity and human life actually started with us modern humans and not these things they keep saying we evolved from,which were probably just animals that, once again have no relation to us actual humans, and for some reason we just can’t get some of our accurate history completely restored, But so far, evolutionists were saying that some of these things we evolved from were apes or ape-like and the more I think about the fact that we probably did not evolve, i was starting to question those claims in my mind, and it actually seems like they were not actually apes at all or ape-like at all, and may have infact been other ethnic groups of humans.

        Another theory (that you often hear that ancient cultures may have also been saying) is that there could have been different human beings created at different era’s of earth’s history from scratch, after some catastrophe or cataclysmic event wiped out the previous groups of humans that was there before. There is also the account in the bible where the people were divided and split-up after trying to build the tower, which caused people to speak different languages and which was perhaps an event that not only caused them to develop different tongues but may have also altered them physically as well which may have resulted in the different races etc, to prevent them form being successful in their plans.

        So as you can see there are plenty of ways this could go theoretically, but the one I am going with is that we did not evolve from apes and that the so-called apes we evolved from, were actually different races and ethnic groups of humans (just as there are different variations of specific groups of animals like a wide variety of different types of birds etc), who’s origins are probably similar in manner to ours as if to suggest that we may have actually been apart of their history and somehow continued to prosper, while for some reason, some of ancient man did not. Which would suggest that there is alot missing about our history that we have yet to determine

        Like

      40. [Lineage Resurrection: Waite A Sec…] (1 Of 2)

        Here me out on this observation i’ll be sharing with you today about early humans, who I do not believe were apes but probably were in fact actual different human races and ethnicities.

        I’m sure some of you may know about ancient cave drawings and similar kinds of findings — one very critical aspect to note is that not even these ancient people who did those drawings depicted themselves as anything associated with apes or ape behavior, ape looks etc.

        There is not one drawing you will find that they themselves drew on the walls and other structures, that shows them in any way to having any likeness to apes. So regardless of what some people may like to claim, the truth is that not even the drawings that these ancient early humans drew of themselves, depicted themselves as having any kind of animal or ape characteristic what-so-ever — this is another important thing that cannot be ignored.

        Now there is sometimes debate over what happened to these ancient humans and the assumption is usually that because they are not here in our life time, that it’s because they are actually us and that they “evolved” into modern day man, which to me is ridiculous because that’s like saying because the ancient egyptians are not here, it’s because they “evolved” into modern day humans, or that they were alien or some rubbish like that, when we all know that isn’t true.

        That’s like saying the ancient greeks just evolved into modern man — additionally what happened to the assyrians?, what happened to the canaanites?, what happened to the ancient babylonians?, what happened to the ancient amazon warriors?, what happened to the ancient arawak and the ancient carib?, we all know what happened to some of these ancient groups of ancient races and people (who were not “apes”), and it’s called; conflict!.

        They didn’t “evolve” into modern day man just because these ancient races and ethnicities and cultures are no longer here. What exactly lead to some of their demise is not always 100% clear, there is a wide possibility of factors like diseases, drought etc, and there is alot of conflict both politically, religiously and prejudicial aspects that affected the rise of many past ancient societies globally, but there is alot of true examples to lean from manny of these ancient cultures that shows how alot of their ancient people are not around today because of many other issues, and not simply because they just “evolved” into races and ethnicities who are currently present in modern times.

        Guess what, there is also a particular wording that you need to pay close attention to when archeologists and paleontologists and scientists talk about “this is when this species first ’emerged'”. What do you think they are referring to when they say “emerged”?, they are actually referring to the “discovery” of a newly found “dead” being.

        The finding of the dead being and how old it is and how far it dates back to, and the data that they were able to derive using modern analysis about the individual deceased specimen, however does not necessarily mean that that’s when that dead being first appeared into existence, it just means that the DEATH of said type of “species”, could be “traced” as far back as that discovery of the skeletal remains of the dead being, but we must be careful in thinking that the time of death of the individual being who’s remains are found, is necessarily indication of the original time of inception of the general species as a whole (which I believe are actually “ethnicities” and and “races”) that the corpse of the being belongs to, until we are in a position to know that for sure, which at this stage (when it comes to most of these things), we rarely can say anything of the sort with certainty.

        Remember some of the scientists and paleontologists and archeologists are trying to link these groups through “evolution”, but if you were to think about what i’m telling you, then you’ll see that i’m suggesting that there is a possibility that there may in fact not have been an evolution!, and that these so-called “species” of beings these experts are claiming we “evolved” from, may have actually infact been separate distinct ethnic groups of humans, SOME of which completely died out for various reasons and did not disappear because they somehow just “evolved” into the modern ethic groups of humans on the earth today.

        I think it might be a reality that humans around today actually got “lucky” to possibly not have fallen to the same fates as the other ancient ethnic groups, SOME of whom may have perished because of harsh ancient climate phenomenons and ancient catastrophes and ancient cataclysms aswell.

        Like

      41. The people of GOD should focus on the knowledge, smart people do smart things. i’m not in the business of being a fraud, or scammer, publicity ratchet, studio gangsters, or bum bitch. I’m into expression and creativity and things like that nature, you know, minding my own damn business and what not. I’m a writer, I haven’t written any “books”, but I have alot of fucking scripts. Follow the knowledge because that’s the future!

        So what i’m sharing with you today, is that at times what comes up from people’s thought-process is that “such-and-such a place or country is non-religious and therefore that’s what made them some of the most ‘peaceful’ places on earth”

        HAAAA!!! is this B.S REALLY supposed to make sense!? ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

        The “thought-process” of some people is essentially no thought-process what-so-ever — that was a good fucking laugh ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚. The real truth is that sometimes when you actually realize what is going on, and you think about some of these places more deeply, and perhaps even do a bit of research, you would be smart enough to see that in alot of these places, the political and “militarized” nature of the society and the forceful way the authoritative-institutions play in the culture, often is the true reason why some of these places are the way they are.

        It often has very little to do with the fact that the country is not “religious”, and alot more to do with the kind of laws and government tactics that rule the land, which tend to have an effect on how the people in the society is controlled.

        So sometimes when you hear “oh such and such a place is non-religious and the people ‘behave'”, you sometimes have to look in the area and history of the laws and the way the governing bodies actually treats the people of the said society, to actually get a true UNDERSTANDING of what is influencing the behavior of the citizens — is it just because the culture is non-religious?, or is it actually because the people are living in a society that was and is historically shaped by heavy-handed dictatorship policies?.

        The stupid argument also arises were some individuals state “look how many churches this place I live in has, and the crime rate is up, how comes there are so many churches and the crime rate is up!”

        What the fuck is this madness!!. Again this thought-process is funny as fuck — actually one of many of the dumbest things I have heard in my life, because the “church” cannot solve all of societies problems neither can the “schools”, especially not by the act of merely increasing the fucking amount of these kinds of places. And the people doing retarded shit obviously don’t care about the fucking churches. They care about brutalizing your poor defenseless granny to a pulp, and snatching the purse — they obviously don’t give a fuck about nobody or anything but themselves, which is why the crime rate is still up, stupid bitches.

        I mean just because you ask a question, it doesn’t mean it is a good question. There is good questions and there are stupid questions, that’s why the wise man gets straight to the point about the truth — regardless of the stupid question, THE TRUTH for mankind, is the only “ANSWER” :D. The goal of learning ultimately is about understanding, and with stupid questions, it’s clear who has absolutely no fucking understanding but might think they do despite a question so incompetent and stupid that it can only be considered “hypothetical”.

        But aside from that, the reality is, alot of these places with the most churches, especially the ones where the majority of people in the country identify as christian, atleast in the western geographic, seems to be doing alot better than many of the places with no “churches” and no “religion”, and I know many of these individuals would not like to leave where they are, to go and live in some of these places with no churches, that are ruled by 1 guy who stays in power for 1000 years with a “military” approach to everything :D.

        Some of these “non-religious” jackasses make up the most stupefied bullshit and should seriously think before exposing their BONEHEADED nature, while trying to make “religion” and “christianity” look shady

        So i say to the people in general, do your research and you will see. But keep in mind that many of the places with what can only be described as a dictatorship or semi-dictatorship regime, have actually changed and modified their laws over decades and decades because of outside influences and other diplomatic political objectives, which is why certain places may not seem as “archaic” or as “barbaric” these days as you may have heard about, but you catch my drift.

        Empty Barrels make the most noise; the biggest clown has the most antics #CornBalls

        Like

      42. When you see some of these ancient drawings depicting human-like beings, what you also see is these human-like beings most of the time in most cultures also bound by the same set of laws and principles of planet earth, as though to be depicted from a human standpoint of conventional assets and utilities developed to cope with real-life technicalities, much of which still remain with us today, such as “clothes” or protective armor, some sort of mechanical contraption, a housing unit, a raft etc etc, which I do not believe is a coincidence. I mean if you ask me, most of it was very much art imitating life on an exaggerated scale, as if to express themselves more creatively and vividly.

        I think it’s inconceivable that these human-like figures are “gods” in any shape or form — that just doesn’t fit well within the timeline of creation, because how in the krap are they going to survive in their early years just being on a planet, unless they have the “knowledge” of basic values of the earth?, which would be a considerable amount of values and principles to take heed. A humanoid brain doesn’t just work to know everything all-of-a-sudden.

        Unless planets have always existed, there is no way that many of these human-like beings would have always existed, which means they too had a creation, but if they had a creation, how is it, that these human-like life-forms are the ones that are appearing on these planets?, for what purpose?. There is just something out-of-nowhere creating human-like “copies” “unintentionally” i.e “evolution”?. I may be unconvinced by i’m not unintelligent xD; that is just bogus, it takes intelligence to pass on the capacity of intelligence, so, whatever is making these things, obviously isn’t unintelligent and probably is FAR more capable at intelligence. Even if not through direct teaching per-say, the very capacity to learn and think in most human-like forms, was still passed on to their traits through the source that originated them in the first place! — still can’t deny that fact. So how is “it” likely to pass on such traits to “humanoids” but not actually have such traits itself?

        Humanoid beings can barely understand themselves yet along understand what it takes to overcome substantial odds necessary to keep themselves from dying off, yet alone have the ability and audacity to originate an existence of things immensely greater than they are, and far greater than themselves at the root of every other aspect, except “intelligence” (which ironically brings critical focus back to a place where, we seem to have been definitely developed to pro-create above all other aspirations, and to make more of our “intelligent” selves on this earth) — tremendous things that sustains far longer than they do, or more accurately, then they ever have.

        Now i’m all about questioning things etc, but a combination of both questions along with vital answers applicable to the relevant scenarios at hand is what leads to real complete progress. Only a super massive fool thinks that one of those aspects is more important than the other and i’m not fooled and i’m also not hesitant to point out who is and what is stupid as fuck and foolish as fuck. I’m not in the business of questioning things solely because people think others must be doing it for the sake of doing it, NAH for me it’s more about the understanding, but to tell you the truth, some of the biggest “questions” I usually have is, what the fuck is going down here with some of these bum motherfuckers :D.

        Like

      43. My religion is the religion of truth!, and if something doesn’t check up, I can’t even begin to accept it. For some, their belief is more than just something that’s “fascinating”; it’s actually something that is empowering and you live by it, it’s a genuine commitment. It’s not a half-assed process, which is the reality many people struggle with, to the point where some avoid it altogether in favor of something more bendable, like their claim of “spirituality” and what not, but others don’t — for us others, it may not be a comfortable road all the time and can be challenging but we stick with that “challenge” or that “task” or that “mission”.

        Some people talk about challenge, but it’s usually about foolishness they are referring to, until they get a real challenge, and then you start hearing about depression and stress instead, and then they no longer want a “challenge”. They want a bendable challenge, not really a real challenge.

        All of that leads me to this; I don’t buy the anunnaki’s explanation that they were just “part” of creation — my friends nobody is just part of creation xD. We all need the ESSENCE, we all need the understanding, we all need the wisdom, even if it’s not by mutual interaction and merely via observational examples, we need the basic principles.

        The anunnaki either have a severe case of amnesia, or the story is just not straight!. If they have amnesia, you have to wonder how do a group of immortals just forget their beginnings?. They were all supposedly “immortal”, so how do you not know how you arrived? — this is not valuable information that should be “lost” easily since none of them actually went anywhere out of the picture presumably, since they are “immortal” and were always around since their very “birth”. C’mon! somebody enlighten me over this convenient “missing-link” :D. Where is their “advanced” documentation made by their advanced “technology”, for their own “beginnings!”

        Like

      44. This is not something I ever thought I would have to make light of, but excuse me while I “call it first” — I have to put this in the catalog since it’s no secret some people just have a way of tremendously fucking up — it don’t stop xD

        I was just looking at this situation about space and people going to the moon and mars, and I also could not help but think of how, god knows what else, could also be indirectly transferred to these interstellar bodies as a result of earthly contact ๐Ÿค”.

        It would be ironic if suddenly there was a claim that there is “life” spotted on the moon or on mars and then you suddenly see things up there, because I’m thinking to myself that there is a possibility that with all the “pollution” and all of the “baggage” (so to speak), the space agencies are bringing up to the surface of the moon and mars from earth, via robots and what not, one of these days you very well might see some stuff pop up LMAO!.

        You might see some things actually growing up there soon-from-now indeed, except it won’t be real “aliens”; it’ll just be the scientific “germs” the astronauts keep shipping across, that were stuck to some part of the rocket or astronaut suit, and dropped off ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ. It’a a very low possibility but that could very well be a case and is something to consider.

        Like

      45. Lets ask the question “was there a ‘big bang?'”, and now lets examine my contextual insight into the matter. On subject on whether or not there was a big bang, I don’t know, that’s what some scientists think because it is a scientific theory and I donn’t know a whole lot about this scientific theory. On the other hand, for me personally I don’t believe that there was likely a “Big Bang” from an evolutionary stand-point, if that’s what you’re asking. To me this stuff, (which is our “reality”) goes way too deep for it all to be just random “luck”; I just cannot, at this stage of my thoughtful capacity, see how there could ever be life constructed from sources which do not possess the element of life, that doesn’t add up to me at all.

        Maybe there was a “big bang”, but I emphatically believe that in the beginning there was the “big words”, like “let there be light” and life and such :D, as a matter of fact, I believe that there was a big “WILL”, aswell as extremely big intentions in addition to all of these big things happening.

        The fact that you can find life right down to the most unseemly of things that makes you scratch your head in awe, proves to me, that literal life has no limit, and I believe that our existence comes down to 2 constant points of contention, essentially being, which fundamental factor came first?, was it raw “material” or conscious “life”?; which is an area where my vision and thinking has been examining lately, and I am of the theory that “life” actually came first, as in, there was the essential elements of consciousness present first, before raw “material” ever in existed, which is an extremely perplexing thought to consider, but right now to me, that seems to be highly most likely.

        In order for any real source of “conscience” to have been into being at such early instances of existence, it has to be a factor that is identical to an “element” that is more in kind and relatable to a chemical property, and not a hard “solid” physical formation, in order to work with such a dynamic range of powerful factors, many of which start off from very small minuscule sequences that are so fine that they are barely tangible or detectable, before they develop into the big solid states we see them as today whether we are talking about planets, clouds, the manipulation of anti-gravity, geometrical configurations, orientation and on-and-on.

        Just as equally, such and “element” would have to be “invulnerable” to these same aspects (if not, the source of these aspects, once again), i.e it is not affected by darkness, it is not affected by light, neither would it be affected by heat, nor affected by cold, neither can it be lonely and neither can it be lustful, zealous etc — all of those qualities and values exhibited, is of an instance that we would call “perfect”. So in summary, our GOD can literally, in that sense, be the true standard of “perfection”.

        So ironically the more I get deeper into this vision, it becomes harder and harder for me to separate GOD from material (meaning, he is “responsible” and not just merely at the mercy of), as if they both are one in the same, because if GOD was first and he has the ability to manifest all of these things, he IS effectively the ESSENCE of these things, so then we are naturally compelled to end up asking the question “why?”, because if a factor, presence and being, is so incredibly powerful, what then is the reason for for all of this “reality”?, why bother with such “insignificant” things?.

        If there is no “need” to do it, then why is it happening?, and this is where the only thing that seems to make sense, is one basic word which is “love”, which would then mean that GOD truly is a creator, he is the conscience, the spirit that literally has the “care” to create stuff, which is a thought that will give you a little understanding of GOD and how GOD has a personality — this thing that is like a chemical and an element/spirit/element/ennnergy has a personality, which again, is very very interesting because this realistic logic i’m am presenting is painting the picture that this incredible thing, who’s nature is not even fully perceptible to us, and has been here before any and everything, has a “personality” which is a crazy thing to think about and is also “humanizing” and relatable — this is where it all starts to be something that we can even begin to understand.

        Now some people would like to marvel at the fact that there could be actually more life out there, but I tend to believe that the absence of that dynamic, seems to suggest that we are more personal and specific, that’s why I don’t really look too much into this stuff about “space being huge so that means it has to have other life out there based on odds and the sheer size”, because another thing that comes to mind in this particular theory of mine is that, “space” might be massive to us, but that doesn’t mean that it is so for the source that created it, if we are to believe that the universe was infact inspired by an intelligent and super unique, one-of-a-kind source, and isn’t random just as our lives doesn’t seem to be all that random.

        I wouldn’t be able to tell you much about the big bang theory, but it’s clear that something was thinking big that’s for sure, and what a big blessing it is to be able to even be talking about this very big deal hahaha

        I mean do you all understand how BIG this truly is?, this is stuff fitting for a fucking script, this is visionary stuff ๐Ÿ’ฏ ๐Ÿ’ฏ. It’s only when folks decide to stop watching people and talking too much and begin to reflect on big issues like life, and what it means, can you stick to your own script and formulate such in-script-ions ๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ˜‚.

        This isn’t just shitty gossip, there are plenty of things you don’t need a “script” for, in fact typically alot of these things don’t even seem to require any fuck brain, but this is messages of visions you just have to share with the people of GOD. It doesn’t matter that it’s a “script” because you can afford to have a script once you have original thoughts (which often require multiple scripts), which is are rare these days (original thoughts), but these are my perfectly scripted thoughts on the critical point of “why” do such realities exist, that anybody can read as much times as they want and have a big break from the usual, non-essential bullshit ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘

        Like

      46. Pertaining to this obscure scenario about “evolution”, the flimsy excuse sometimes is “the species mingled”; well the reality also is that some things do not mix.

        Sure there are “mixed” humans, but guess what bros!, they are still all humans — they did not turn into dinosaurs and birds and completely totally different life forms, so even with using an example like this, we can see that “evolution” does not happen and does not make sense.

        Oh yes! there are “mixed” breed dogs, but guess what sistuz!, they are still all dogs — they did not turn into dinosaurs and birds and completely totally different life forms, so even with using an example like this, we can see that “evolution” does not happen and does not make sense.

        Brothas and sistuz, do not believe the hype — “mix-breeding” and “inter-breeding” is not fucking “evolution”; when creatures are mix-bred or inter-breed, that is exactly what the fuck it is; “mixing” genes. That is in no way an “evolution” where freak “mutations” happen overtime, and took “millions upon millions” of fucking “years” to develop due to circumstantial influences.

        Do you know how many different planetary atmospheres have already been discovered, and how many different chemicals there are and how many different textures already exist and how many different sounds can be made? — an all-powerful dynamic deity responsible for such rich vastness is a real master at originating NUMEROUS incalculable distinctions!. “Diversity” is clock-work to a GOD ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿ˜Ž

        Like

      47. Today it’s time to welcome more enlightenment over the notion of evolution and just how ridiculous “evolution” actually is; now these people when they talk about “evolution” they usually, under the same pretext, talk about such-and-such developed “this” over millions and million of years, now the real reason why they seem to make these claims is because of the manner in which they find fossils, i.e, they will find a fossil over here that’s 100 killion years old, and then they will find a fossil in a next spot that has SIMILAR characteristics but which only dates to be about 1 killion years, and because of that gap among other things, they would try to suggest that the 1 killion year old fossil with “similar” characteristics somehow may have “evolved” form the much older 100 killion year old species xD. Now they don’t explicitly state this, atleast to my knowledge at this current moment, but that’s what it seems like to me, to be the standard way that they approach this issue.

        The problem however with all of this “taking millions and millions of years to ‘evolve'” baseless notion, is that the individual creatures within the species or within the different animal types, do not live for “million and millions” of years.

        On average, a male and a female animal, lives for a about 30 years, have off spring, then actually dies at about the age of 100 (and that’s just an optimistic figure), if they are not killed prematurely by other creatures, accidents or illnesses — they do not individually go on to live for a long enough time to develop some weird random evolutionary freak mutation because of some random passive circumstantial dysfunction.

        MOST animals and creatures all die after living relative short lives by today’s standards, and a fresh set of off-spring comes into existence through manual reproduction, who then goes on to carry on the linage of that species, and additionally it would be very hard or any animal types, to all-of-sudden “mutate” if they were all to function and behave instinctual according to their natural environments, so-on and such, and would most likely stay as they are originally, once they live according to their natural laws and cycles. So not only does “evolution” in MOST cases not make any sense logically, in MOST cases it also does NOT happen with any existing creatures we see around today either.

        None of these species go on to live even remotely long enough to develop all of these individual characteristics both internally and externally and instinctively (since proper instinct is also very vital and important in these instances), that need to all come together in a particular order and way, in order to create a whole other different functional type of species, and whole other entirely different kind of animal literally.

        Even on top of that, it would require the females and males to both develop in the same exact ways through the same exact random experiences in order for both male and females to “evolve” identically, so even the timing has to be in such a way; otherwise the so-called “evolutions” an individual animal of a species develops, could just be an alternative way of describing an actual “deformity”, “abnormality” or “disfigurement” LMAO.

        There is air and then there is water, there is fire and then there is ice, there is planets and then there is suns, and then there is star dust, there is the blackness in space, and within that, there is light given off by various objects — they are all different, and that to me is how life really works. “Evolution” is laughable, there is just different things is life, and there has always been, this is what the fuck we see today and exactly why we do not see true “evolution”, except in a very small few animals who go through metamorphisis such as caterpillars, tadpoles and flies and mosquitoes, to all reach their ultimate respective states of complete development, and not on the contrary because of some random circumstantial freak-mutation that was never really meant to happen.

        Like

      48. I play video games and right now i’m going to talk about something video game related today, just because of the fact that I am compelled too for the moment, so this isn’t going to be religious or related to GOD, history and Origins as some of my other sessions.

        This is about Asphalt 8, and how to me the latest update to Asphalt 8 is the worst update to ever be applied to the game xD. This is a ton of info and insight that can also be applied to other games aswell. In my opinion, the latest changes implemented in the latest update of Asphalt 8, is very bad and it does not actually effectively do anything at all to make multiplayer match making any better. Atleast not as far as I can tell, all it did was shuffle around ranks and adjusted the ranks of some of the cars, which virtually did nothing to improve multiplayer overall on a meaningful scope, and to solve the issue of the lopsided way the game’s system currently deals with match making. From what i can see there is still currently and ALOT of uneven match making, and once again, there is still the issue of cars in lower classes being paired up to race with way faster cars in higher classes, so whatever the asphalt developers were trying to do, clearly had nothing to do with actually “balancing” the game.

        In my opinion there are people on the Asphalt team who are making very bad decisions and not supporting proper ideas, and as long as these people are on involved with certain areas of the game, the game isn’t going to improve because they are not supporting great ideas. In my opinion these individuals need to be reassigned and completely removed from the task at hand, and replaced with people who can actually fix this game’s stifling issues, because if you keep the same folks there, you’ll keep having the same result. To my knowledge, that little short test Multiplayer system season they had some time in 2018, around september where they matched cars based on speed (they should have taken it a step further and take overall car performance compared to another car’s overall performance, into account) was actually the best attempt that they had made at creating a balanced multiplayer match making system. They should have stuck with that frame work, and made necessary adjustments to it where ever that was needed. Since that update, all of the things they have tried since, that were supposedly to correct the match making in multiplayer, were just laughable and useless and nonsensical xD

        The short test season that was based on matching cars based on speed, was actually the best because it sort of did the most comprehensive adjustments which actually minimized the issue of the “uneven match making” in the game, and they should go back to that model of a matching system since the overwhelming majority of players in the game found that system to have been the most fun they had in the game since cars where match based on performance and as a result there wasn’t any huge problems with as much uneven and lopsided matches-making as there is now and it wasn’t so boring either because everyone could have chosen whatever car they wanted and have fun in the game, since the way the cars were matched, it was a million times more fair.

        The default match making system is dated and severely flawed, it just took a while for people to realize just how messy it is when they started to add more content and cars to the game, this much is clear and infact it is the sole reason why many people including me, for a good while now, were calling for better match making in multiplayer in the first place. Match making in multiplayer along with the points distribution function definitely needs fixing, it’s not just me that sees that, many other people who are wise and know about game design and what makes practical sense, from what is complete stupidity, knows these issues in the game, and knows that these issues are keeping it back, but this latest update was by far the worst update, and the silly thing about it is that the game is still unevenly matching cars in multiplayer in the same identical manner as the default match making system, so what is the point of this damn update?.

        A much better idea would be to go back to the test multi-player system that matched cars based on speed/performance, and make edits and adjustments to that framework over time. Plus once again you can also make the match making more balanced in the game by NOT matching certain cars together. It is very ridiculous to have D-class car matched with A-class cars that are obviously way faster, and having B-class cars matched with S-class cars that are obviously way faster. Via the method of NOT matching certain cars together, you can easily solve this issue!

        One good thing I noticed that they can keep but refine it over time, is that when you place within a certain spot, you no longer lose points, which is great because points in this game should be earthed it makes absolutely no sense that someone could come 1st 2nd or 3rd and get no points or lose a ton of point, yet still people who perform very poorly and who came 4th 5th, 6st or even come in dead last, could be rewarded a million points just because of their player “rating”, even though they did very badly and even though the competition between the individuals who placed 1st, 2nd and 3rd was alot more competitive and was alot harder to archive as a result. So it is remarkable that you’re actually gaining points based off of actually earning your spot and putting effort into actually competing rather than it being based on someone just showing up and rewarded a ton of point points just based on their ratings regardless of how poorly they actually did.

        There was nothing terribly wrong with the game, people like myself just noticed that there were some areas that could be way better like the matching making and the way the game awards rating point etc, and just pointed these things out, and myself offered some ideas about how to actually get these issues managed, especially with the lopsided and uneven match making inn multiplayer.

        Some R&Ds seem to be a little harder, ok fair enough but like I said before, the issue is not just that the R&Ds are challenging, the damn things were challenging before aswell too. Making it more challenging doesn’t necessarily mean that would make it more interesting or compelling to players, and the issue at hand is the fact that if you’re going to make a very challenging R&Ds, atleast make the cars and vehicles that you can win in those R&Ds actual rewards that are worth getting, because it makes no sense taking part in expensive brutally hard R&Ds, to only receive cars and bikes etc, that are barely as good as many of the cars most people already have, and have had for months and even years. It makes no sense for anyone to take part is such difficult and expensive R&Ds for stuff that’s just lackluster garbage, that is a complete waste of people’s time.

        I can go to “Test Drive Unlimited 2” and see some level of meaningful adjustments and updates, I can go to “Need For Speed” and see some level of meaningful adjustments and updates, I can go to the “Forza” series and see some level of meaningful adjustments and updates, I can go to “The Crew” and see some level of meaningful adjustments and updates and I probably can go to the recent “Gran Turismo” games and see some level of meaningful adjustments and updates. While some of these games are not on Mobile as the Asphalt series is, that’s is still part of the big picture, Asphalt 8 needs to becareful not to lose it’s edge because the time spent fixing a number of completely avoidable problems with the game, could be time better spending on actually adding and making improvements to the game instead ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿคฃ

        Like

      49. I offer sober-reminders of how life works because some people tend to lose touch, and put false folly out into the atmosphere. I’m not a drunk bitch or coked up, i’m very sober, i’m crazy as fuck but i’m very sober and I bring to you sincere perspectives on life.

        I make you feel good about being sober :D, people like me make you feel good about stuff you never thought about, that’s what folk like me do, we like to untwist the mind that may have been tangled and warped into a knot by some one else’s shitty toxic tentacles. Other people, they can’t deal with it, so they retreat they do the bullshit, and they sugar coat it, but that’s not my fucking style.

        Toxic urinary maggot flip-flops will always have their toxic ways, you can’t save vermin like that, their cancer eats them up from the inside.

        Some individuals are truly dumb as fuck now-a-days, every little bitch and his mom, know about the illuminati “secrets”, and “know” (and I use “know” loosely, because truly, alot of these nuts just talk a-whole-lot of bullshit most of the time) about the free-masons, and can tell you what they are doing blah blah — yeah the nuts have an “excuse” for everything, and then what they tell you is ohh “they” are going to “control” you, but that’s ironic because every goddamn time you look around, these same clowns are the head ones poisoning their own selves and altering their own minds with shitty substances and mindless intoxication.

        Imagine that, their minds are so much fucking wasted worthless shit, that half the crap they claim “illuminati”, the masons, or whoever the fuck the scapegoat is, are working on, isn’t even going to fucking work HAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!.

        Now depending on how you look at it, that could’ve have been actually a good thing, but not with these clown fuckers, since they are all the way fucked up.

        For them it gets so much deeper — the connections they’re trying to establish isn’t going to work, their “relationships” ain’t going to work, their rationale ain’t going to work, their justifications ain’t going to work, nothing these messy dipshits do is going to be reliable, or viable at all.

        “They” (who ever the fuck the scapegoat is) don’t even have to lift a finger for these nutcases, they’ll probably just use that same “finger” and finger-fuck all the fucking females in the entire fucking dysfunctional fucking family by the time these “drunk” and “high” jackasses sober-up.

        That’s because the bums turned themselves into zombies, with booze and some other wack ass substances somebody “smuggled” through their ass-crack. They are so drunk and “high”, they don’t even know what the fuck going on. How the fuck are you going to give directions, when half-the time you can’t even trust your own self to even walk straight and navigate — when more than half the time you don’t even know what the fuck is going on with yourself much less!.

        Then these same fools are going to turn around talking about somebody trying to “control” something — clueless bitch shut the fuck up, you’re fucking your own mind up the most with the shit you’re takin’. Who ever the fuck you all trying to “prepare” for, are sitting back and LAUGHING at you bitches, while finger-fucking.

        To the people I say, it’s best to keep your mind functional, so you can actually be functional in society, that’s what sobering up does. Further more, for the toxic fucks, some of you stupid azz motherfuckers is just setting yourselves up for “rape culture” — in 2019 being a drugged up, drunkard bitch is not a joke. It’s not like what you see on T.V.

        You’re going to either find yourself literally dead somewhere, or end up with a “rape” change — alot of these dumb motherfuckers tend to be talking about “waking up in bed drunk”, next thing you hear “ohh he ‘raped’ me”, “she raped me, waaaa I was raped” — they’re gonna “#MeToo” your fucking stupid bitch ass xD.

        That’s reality, not the drunk version. There is the drunk version and then there is the real version, i’m giving you the real version. A sober mind flows workable thoughts, but that’s not the problem for a sober thinker, the issue for the sober thinker, is were to go with those thoughts, but on the other hand, if you have toxic ways and you’re inebriated, you’re not going anywhere dum-dum, EXCEPT maybe down the shit-hole — that’s the whole point.

        Like

      50. In terms of that sumerian text, we still have to sort out that thing about the “apes”; where are the damn apes in mesopotamia?, and why the fuck is there some of the oldest human remains found all over earth, and none in mesopotamia?. It’s becoming increasingly clear, to all of us with a motherfucking human-brain, that these so-called “neanderthals” and what have you, aren’t no damn apes, these were different, what we call today, “races” and “ethnicities” of humans, they were not “apes”, they didn’t even have no hunched-backs, or even a fucking tail.

        All apes have hunched-backs and fur, some evolutionists in the scientific community are trying to frame these things as apes, to set up a realistic basis for fictitious frivolous evolution, but that’s forged evolution — these beings were humans, and the ones that are not, are actual animals being falsely labeled as “human species” because of that stupid thing they call “evolution”.

        It’s not advanced fucking geometry, in fact, even the damn bible and ancient texts says it; there was animals on the planet earth before humans, there was no animals that were also human. There was animals and THEN came humans, human “evolution” is bullshit and nutso, it is not real it is a diversion, it is a piss poor scheme to counteract religion and religious views about creation. There is nothing that is really valid about it, it is complete shit stain, there is nothing in reality that correlates with their particular narrative of human “evolution” or actually validates it — it’s just and only a failed nutty attempt to counteract “religious” sentiment about creation.

        It’s like “big foot”; there is silly folks that would believe anything — so somewhere there is this creature large enough to have big azz feet, human mannerisms, and somehow elude any kind of contact, with fucking drones and helicopters and smartphones and satellite imagery and “cameras” all over the fucking place?, were the fuck is something like that going to hide?, it’s so big it can’t even climb trees well or at all — people are retarded enough to believe this fuckry?.

        It’s best if some of these dorks sat online with these cybernetic orgies they call a “chat”, since they they really do suck alot and just give alot of mouth and lip, and beg for “donations” or something, and stay put and keep their pile of dripping garbage secluded there, because with that kind of thinking, you fuckers definitely ain’t going nowhere, and you will not advance humanity — life is doomed with the folly of you clueless jackasses.

        Like

      Leave a Reply

      Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

      WordPress.com Logo

      You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

      Google photo

      You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

      Twitter picture

      You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

      Facebook photo

      You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

      Connecting to %s

      %d bloggers like this:
      search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close